Obeng Deborah Nimako Sarpong, Osei Samuel, Brown Nii Kpakpo, Nana Adjei David, Amoah Linda Eva, Owusu Ewurama Dedea Ampadu
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, United States of America.
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 9;4(6):e0000884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000884. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Novel automated digital malaria diagnostic tests are being developed with the advancement of diagnostic tools. Whilst these tools are being evaluated and implemented in the general population, there is the need to focus on special populations such as individuals with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) who have altered red blood cell morphology and atypical immune responses, which can obscure parasite detection. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of one of such tools, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) malaria screener app in people living with sickle cell disease in a malaria-endemic country, Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among SCD patients attending the Sickle Cell Clinic at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Following informed consent, whole blood samples were collected and analyzed using the NLM malaria screener app, conventional microscopy, RDT, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), with PCR as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each diagnostic method were compared against PCR results. The NLM app identified the highest number of positive malaria cases, with 110 positive cases (36.2%), while both RDT and microscopy reported the highest number of negatives, with 287 negative cases (94.4%). Compared to PCR, the NLM app demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 67.4%. RDT and microscopy displayed the same sensitivity as the NLM app, each achieving 89.5%. However, while RDT and microscopy had a specificity of 100%, the NLM app had a considerably lower specificity of 67.4%.The NLM malaria screener app shows promise as a preliminary screening tool for malaria in individuals with SCD. However, its lower specificity indicates a need for confirmatory testing to avoid potential overdiagnosis and mismanagement. Enhancements in the app's specificity could further support its utility in rapid and accessible malaria diagnosis for people with SCD, aiding in timely management and treatment.
随着诊断工具的进步,新型自动化数字疟疾诊断测试正在不断开发。在这些工具于普通人群中进行评估和应用的同时,有必要关注特殊人群,例如镰状细胞病(SCD)患者,他们的红细胞形态发生改变且免疫反应不典型,这可能会掩盖寄生虫检测结果。本研究旨在评估此类工具之一——美国国立医学图书馆(NLM)疟疾筛查应用程序在疟疾流行国家加纳的镰状细胞病患者中的诊断性能。在加纳阿克拉科勒布教学医院镰状细胞诊所就诊的SCD患者中开展了一项描述性横断面研究。在获得知情同意后,采集全血样本,并使用NLM疟疾筛查应用程序、传统显微镜检查、快速诊断测试(RDT)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行分析,以PCR作为参考标准。将每种诊断方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)与PCR结果进行比较。NLM应用程序检测出的疟疾病例阳性数最多,为110例阳性病例(36.2%),而RDT和显微镜检查报告的阴性数最多,为287例阴性病例(94.4%)。与PCR相比,NLM应用程序的敏感性为89.5%,特异性为67.4%。RDT和显微镜检查的敏感性与NLM应用程序相同,均达到89.5%。然而,虽然RDT和显微镜检查的特异性为100%,但NLM应用程序的特异性则低得多,为67.4%。NLM疟疾筛查应用程序有望成为SCD患者疟疾的初步筛查工具。然而,其较低的特异性表明需要进行确证性检测,以避免潜在的过度诊断和管理不当。提高该应用程序的特异性可进一步支持其在为SCD患者进行快速且便捷的疟疾诊断中的效用,有助于及时管理和治疗。