Ninsiima Mackline, Muhoozi Michael, Luzze Henry, Kasasa Simon
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, Uganda National Institute of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;5(6):e0003745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003745. eCollection 2025.
Vaccine wastage remains a challenge to effective immunization; especially in low-income countries. We estimated vaccine wastage rates and assessed attributed factors in Mukono and Kalungu districts in Uganda. A mixed methods study design was utilised to estimate vaccine wastage rates for BGC, OPV, IPV, PCV, MR, DPT-HepB-Hib for 6 months prospectively from March-August 2022 and assess attributed factors in 22 health facilities. Mann-Kendall statistical test was used to assess significance of observed trends. We applied Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests to compare vaccine wastage rates per vaccine by district, ownership, and type of health facility. Additionally, we administered a questionnaire among 57 health workers and conducted 15 Key Informant Interviews to understand reasons for vaccine wastage. Overall vaccine wastage rates were BCG (70%), MR (58%), DPT-HepB-Hib (21%), IPV (31%), OPV (28%) and PCV (17%); exceeding accepted vaccine wastage rates in Kalungu and Mukono districts. Significant variations were observed across the different types of health facilities [BCG (p < 0.001), IPV (p = 0.023), MR (p = 0.004) and OPV (0.008)] and among health facilities located within urban and rural areas [BCG (p < 0.001), MR (p < 0.001) and OPV (0.003)]. Vaccine wastage rates for BCG and MR vaccines were higher compared to other vaccines because remaining doses in opened vials were discarded within 6 hours of reconstitution, as per the Multi Dose Vial Policy (MDVP). Other contributing factors were low turn up during outreaches, errors and non-completion of vaccine monitoring tools, cold chain failures and inadequate training in vaccine management. Vaccine wastage rates for all vaccines were relatively higher than acceptable levels in both districts. Intensified efforts such as regular review of vial opening guidelines, predictive modelling for outreach planning, decentralized vaccination approaches, and availability of vaccines in reduced-volume multi-dose vials where feasible could minimize vaccine wastage.
疫苗浪费仍然是有效免疫接种面临的一项挑战;在低收入国家尤其如此。我们估计了乌干达穆科诺区和卡伦古区的疫苗浪费率,并评估了相关因素。采用混合方法研究设计,前瞻性地估计了2022年3月至8月6个月期间卡介苗(BCG)、口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)、灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV)、肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV)、麻疹疫苗(MR)、百白破-乙肝- Hib疫苗(DPT-HepB-Hib)的疫苗浪费率,并评估了22个医疗机构中的相关因素。使用曼-肯德尔统计检验来评估观察到的趋势的显著性。我们应用曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯H检验,按地区、所有权和医疗机构类型比较每种疫苗的疫苗浪费率。此外,我们对57名卫生工作者进行了问卷调查,并进行了15次关键信息访谈,以了解疫苗浪费的原因。总体疫苗浪费率为:卡介苗(70%)、麻疹疫苗(58%)、百白破-乙肝- Hib疫苗(21%)、灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(31%)、口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(28%)和肺炎球菌结合疫苗(17%);超过了卡伦古区和穆科诺区可接受的疫苗浪费率。在不同类型的医疗机构中观察到了显著差异[卡介苗(p < 0.001)、灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(p = 0.023)、麻疹疫苗(p = 0.004)和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(0.008)],以及城乡地区医疗机构之间的显著差异[卡介苗(p < 0.001)、麻疹疫苗(p < 0.001)和口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(0.003)]。与其他疫苗相比,卡介苗和麻疹疫苗的疫苗浪费率更高,因为根据多剂量瓶政策(MDVP),开封瓶中的剩余剂量在复溶后6小时内被丢弃。其他促成因素包括外展活动期间接种人数少、疫苗监测工具出现错误和未完成、冷链故障以及疫苗管理培训不足。两个区所有疫苗的疫苗浪费率均相对高于可接受水平。加强相关努力,如定期审查瓶开封指南、进行外展规划的预测建模、采用分散式疫苗接种方法以及在可行的情况下提供小容量多剂量瓶疫苗,可尽量减少疫苗浪费。