Scher K S, Scott-Conner C, Jones C W, Wroczynski A F
Ann Surg. 1985 Nov;202(5):595-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198511000-00010.
The intravascular clearance of type 3 Streptococcus pneumoniae was studied in Sprague-Dawley rats. Sham celiotomy was performed on 20 animals while another 20 rats underwent splenectomy. Four weeks later, bacteremia was induced by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of S. pneumoniae. Serial cultures of peripheral blood were obtained. Splenectomy produced significant impairment of intravascular clearance of bacteria compared to that noted among control animals (p less than 0.01). Eighty animals were divided into four equal groups: I--splenectomy, II--50% splenectomy with the upper half left in situ connected to the short gastric vessels, III--50% splenectomy with the lower half left in situ connected to the hilar vessels, and IV--splenectomy with implantation of splenic fragments. Pneumococcus was administered IP 16 weeks later. Rats were killed 6 hours after bacterial challenge. Residual splenic tissue was weighed. There was significantly less splenic tissue in Groups II-IV than noted in sham animals after 16 weeks (p less than 0.01). The type of partial splenectomy did not significantly affect the weight of residual splenic tissue 16 weeks later. Implantation did yield viable splenic tissue, though the amount proved significantly less than that resulting from either type of partial splenectomy (p less than 0.01). Mean bacterial counts with time for short gastric (Group II) and hilar (Group III) remnant animals were significantly different from those for the asplenic (Group I) rats (p less than 0.02 and p less than 0.001, respectively). Animals with splenic implants (Group IV) were not significantly different from asplenic rats (Group I). Animals with hilar splenic remnants proved significantly different from those with short gastric splenic remnants (p less than 0.01). Partial splenectomy offers protection against pneumococcal bacteremia, though preservation of the hilar blood supply affords the most benefit. The utility of splenic implantation remains unproven.
在斯普拉格-道利大鼠中研究了3型肺炎链球菌的血管内清除情况。对20只动物进行假剖腹手术,而另外20只大鼠接受脾切除术。四周后,通过腹腔注射肺炎链球菌诱导菌血症。获取外周血的系列培养物。与对照动物相比,脾切除术使细菌的血管内清除显著受损(p<0.01)。80只动物被分成四组,每组数量相等:I组——脾切除术;II组——保留上半部分原位并与胃短血管相连的50%脾切除术;III组——保留下半部分原位并与脾门血管相连的50%脾切除术;IV组——脾切除术并植入脾碎片。16周后腹腔注射肺炎球菌。细菌攻击6小时后处死大鼠。称取残余脾组织重量。16周后,II-IV组的脾组织明显少于假手术动物(p<0.01)。部分脾切除术的类型对16周后残余脾组织的重量没有显著影响。植入确实产生了有活力的脾组织,尽管其数量明显少于任何一种部分脾切除术所产生的数量(p<0.01)。胃短血管(II组)和脾门血管(III组)残留动物的细菌平均计数随时间的变化与无脾(I组)大鼠的明显不同(分别为p<0.02和p<0.001)。有脾植入物的动物(IV组)与无脾大鼠(I组)没有显著差异。有脾门脾残留的动物与有胃短血管脾残留的动物明显不同(p<0.01)。部分脾切除术可预防肺炎球菌菌血症,尽管保留脾门血供带来的益处最大。脾植入的效用尚未得到证实。