• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国普通人群中自闭症谱系障碍诊断预测模型的开发与验证

Development and Validation of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Korean General Population.

作者信息

Kim Hyelee, Leventhal Bennett L, Koh Yun-Joo, Gennatas Efstathios D, Kim Young Shin

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAACAP Open. 2024 May 27;3(2):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.005
PMID:40520973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166942/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Delays in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis and treatment are significant clinical problems that can be addressed by timely, community-based assessment. This study examined tools for identifying ASD in community settings using machine learning (ML) models.

METHOD

This study analyzed population-based cross-sectional studies (2005-2017) of ASD in South Korea. A community sample of 62,083 children was screened using the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ) and teacher/caregiver referrals. Caregivers completed the Behavior Assessment System for Children-2nd Edition (BASC-2) and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Screen positives were offered a comprehensive clinical evaluation. Among the first-graders in regular elementary schools who completed the diagnostic evaluation (N = 746), supervised ML models (generalized linear model with elastic net regularization [GLMNET], classification and regression tree, random forest, and gradient boosting [GB]) were developed and validated for classification of ASD. Models were developed in the single questionnaire and combined questionnaire datasets, using questionnaire responses and demographic and developmental information.

RESULTS

ASD was diagnosed in 46.2% of children (median age, 6.8 years [interquartile range, 6.5-7.1 years]; 71.7% boys). Among single questionnaire models, the BASC GB model demonstrated the best discrimination ability (area under the curve 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.83). Area under the curve of the GLMNET model with combined ASSQ, BASC-2, and SRS was the highest, 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.89); the predicted risk of ASD by the GB model of combined questionnaires agreed the best with the observed risk of ASD compared with other ML models.

CONCLUSION

Caregiver questionnaire ML models showed future promise for identifying children with ASD in community settings.

摘要

目的

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)诊断和治疗的延迟是重大临床问题,可通过及时的社区评估来解决。本研究使用机器学习(ML)模型检验了在社区环境中识别ASD的工具。

方法

本研究分析了韩国基于人群的ASD横断面研究(2005 - 2017年)。使用自闭症谱系筛查问卷(ASSQ)以及教师/照顾者转诊对62,083名儿童的社区样本进行筛查。照顾者完成了儿童行为评估系统第二版(BASC - 2)和社会反应量表(SRS)。筛查呈阳性者接受全面临床评估。在完成诊断评估的正规小学一年级学生中(N = 746),开发并验证了监督ML模型(带弹性网正则化的广义线性模型[GLMNET]、分类回归树、随机森林和梯度提升[GB])用于ASD分类。模型在单一问卷和组合问卷数据集中开发,使用问卷回答以及人口统计学和发育信息。

结果

46.2%的儿童被诊断为ASD(中位年龄6.8岁[四分位间距,6.5 - 7.1岁];71.7%为男孩)。在单一问卷模型中,BASC GB模型表现出最佳的区分能力(曲线下面积0.80,95%置信区间0.75 - 0.83)。结合ASSQ、BASC - 2和SRS的GLMNET模型的曲线下面积最高,为0.82(95%置信区间0.77 - 0.89);与其他ML模型相比,组合问卷的GB模型预测的ASD风险与观察到的ASD风险最相符。

结论

照顾者问卷ML模型在社区环境中识别ASD儿童方面显示出未来的应用前景。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Korean General Population.韩国普通人群中自闭症谱系障碍诊断预测模型的开发与验证
JAACAP Open. 2024 May 27;3(2):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The social responsiveness scale in relation to DSM IV and DSM5 ASD in Korean children.韩国儿童中与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版及第五版自闭症谱系障碍相关的社会反应量表
Autism Res. 2016 Sep;9(9):970-80. doi: 10.1002/aur.1671. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
3
Use of Machine Learning Models to Differentiate Neurodevelopment Conditions Through Digitally Collected Data: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.利用机器学习模型通过数字收集的数据鉴别神经发育状况:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 29;8:e54577. doi: 10.2196/54577.
4
Identifying major predictors for parenting stress in a caregiver of autism spectrum disorder using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型识别自闭症谱系障碍照顾者育儿压力的主要预测因素。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 29;17:1229155. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1229155. eCollection 2023.
5
Detecting Developmental Delay and Autism Through Machine Learning Models Using Home Videos of Bangladeshi Children: Development and Validation Study.通过使用孟加拉国儿童家庭视频的机器学习模型检测发育迟缓与自闭症:开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 24;21(4):e13822. doi: 10.2196/13822.
6
The reliability and validity of the social responsiveness scale to measure autism symptomology in Vietnamese children.社会反应性量表在越南儿童自闭症症状评估中的信度和效度。
Autism Res. 2019 Nov;12(11):1706-1718. doi: 10.1002/aur.2179. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Machine Learning Prediction of Autism Spectrum Disorder From a Minimal Set of Medical and Background Information.基于最小的医疗和背景信息集对自闭症谱系障碍的机器学习预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429229. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29229.
8
Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 4 Years - Early Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, Seven Sites, United States, 2010, 2012, and 2014.4 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的流行率和特征——早期自闭症和发育障碍监测网络,美国七个地点,2010、2012 和 2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Apr 12;68(2):1-19. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6802a1.
9
Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014.8 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍患病率 - 自闭症及发育障碍监测网,美国 11 个监测点,2014 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Apr 27;67(6):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1.
10
Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.学龄前儿童自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD009044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009044.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2020.2020 年,美国 11 个监测点自闭症和发育障碍监测网络 8 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的流行率和特征。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Mar 24;72(2):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1.
2
Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry.精准精神病学中机器学习的现代观点。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Nov 11;3(11):100602. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100602.
3
Estimating Subgroup Effects in Generalizability and Transportability Analyses.
在可推广性和可转移性分析中估计亚组效应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 8;193(1):149-158. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac036.
4
Maternal mid-gestational and child cord blood immune signatures are strongly associated with offspring risk of ASD.母孕期和胎儿脐带血免疫特征与后代 ASD 发病风险密切相关。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;27(3):1527-1541. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01415-4. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
Machine Learning for Differential Diagnosis Between Clinical Conditions With Social Difficulty: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Early Psychosis, and Social Anxiety Disorder.用于社交困难临床病症鉴别诊断的机器学习:自闭症谱系障碍、早期精神病性障碍和社交焦虑障碍
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 19;11:545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00545. eCollection 2020.
6
A Metabolomics Approach to Screening for Autism Risk in the Children's Autism Metabolome Project.代谢组学方法在儿童自闭症代谢组学项目中筛选自闭症风险的应用。
Autism Res. 2020 Aug;13(8):1270-1285. doi: 10.1002/aur.2330. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Editorial Perspective: The autism waitlist crisis and remembering what families need.社论观点:自闭症候诊名单危机和记住家庭所需。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):140-142. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13254. Epub 2020 May 8.
8
Multi-modular AI Approach to Streamline Autism Diagnosis in Young Children.多模块人工智能方法简化幼儿自闭症诊断
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 19;10(1):5014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61213-w.
9
Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.用于诊断自闭症谱系障碍的机器学习算法的准确性:脑磁共振成像研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Dec 20;6(12):e14108. doi: 10.2196/14108.
10
Identification and Quantification of Gaps in Access to Autism Resources in the United States: An Infodemiological Study.美国自闭症资源获取差距的识别与量化:一项信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e13094. doi: 10.2196/13094.