• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同设计疼痛管理中心护理模式的开发与整合:双阶段定性研究方案

Co-Design for Developing and Integrating a Model of Care for Pain Management Centers: Protocol for a Biphase Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Zhao Emma, Vaccaro Lisa, Lee Yi-Ching, Brake Timothy James, Serafimovska Anastasia

机构信息

Pain Management Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.

Pain Medicine Research, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 18;14:e59126. doi: 10.2196/59126.

DOI:10.2196/59126
PMID:40532202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12223451/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current gold standard chronic pain management applies a biopsychosocial lens to clinical care, integrating medication, psychosocial support, and physical reconditioning to promote sustained treatment success, increase quality of life, and control symptoms. However, only 40% of patients with chronic pain report adequate pain management. Unfortunately, evidence describing implemented treatment pathways or models of care (MoCs) that consistently use this holistic approach is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to identify the barriers and facilitators to access and engagement in existing MoCs for chronic pain, explore aspects of the delivery of care that can be improved, and develop an improved MoC for pain clinics in New South Wales by directly liaising with people with chronic pain and their families.

METHODS

A 2-phase qualitative study will be conducted using semistructured focus groups. Both phases will follow the same structure, so patients, carers, and clinicians will independently provide input into the proposed MoC, which will then be summarized and integrated by the research team. Participants will be encouraged to interact and speak freely across three core domains: (1) experience of chronic pain management, (2) barriers and facilitators to delivering/accessing a gold standard MoC, and (3) key improvement points to existing models. Each focus group will last 90 minutes and be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative analysis. The focus groups in phase one will generate initial recommendations for primary changes to the existing MoC, and these will then be integrated and presented for evaluation, feasibility, and acceptability by stakeholder groups during phase two.

RESULTS

Data collection commenced in September 2023 and is expected to end by September 2025. As of February 2024, we have completed the focus group with clinicians (n=12) and patients (n=7) in phase one. Data have not been analyzed formally and will be reported in a future publication.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the exploration of key stakeholders' perspectives of the barriers preventing access and the delivery of care in the current MoC for chronic pain, we aim to co-design an appropriate, feasible, and acceptable pathway to be implemented in pain services in the future.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/59126.

摘要

背景

当前慢性疼痛管理的金标准是在临床护理中采用生物心理社会视角,整合药物治疗、心理社会支持和身体康复,以促进持续的治疗成功、提高生活质量并控制症状。然而,只有40%的慢性疼痛患者报告疼痛得到了充分管理。不幸的是,缺乏描述始终采用这种整体方法的已实施治疗途径或护理模式(MoC)的证据。

目的

本研究的目的是确定现有慢性疼痛MoC中获取和参与的障碍及促进因素,探索可改进的护理提供方面,并通过直接与慢性疼痛患者及其家人联系,为新南威尔士州的疼痛诊所开发一种改进的MoC。

方法

将使用半结构化焦点小组进行一项两阶段定性研究。两个阶段将遵循相同的结构,因此患者、护理人员和临床医生将独立为拟议的MoC提供意见,然后由研究团队进行总结和整合。将鼓励参与者在三个核心领域进行互动并自由发言:(1)慢性疼痛管理经验,(2)提供/获取金标准MoC的障碍及促进因素,以及(3)现有模式的关键改进点。每个焦点小组将持续90分钟,并进行录音和逐字转录以进行定性分析。第一阶段的焦点小组将为现有MoC的主要变更提出初步建议,然后在第二阶段由利益相关者群体对这些建议进行整合并评估其可行性和可接受性。

结果

数据收集于2023年9月开始,预计于202五年9月结束。截至2024年2月,我们已在第一阶段完成了与临床医生(n = 12)和患者(n = 7)的焦点小组。数据尚未进行正式分析,将在未来的出版物中报告。

结论

通过探索关键利益相关者对当前慢性疼痛MoC中阻碍获取和提供护理的障碍的看法,我们旨在共同设计一条合适、可行且可接受的途径,以便将来在疼痛服务中实施。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/59126。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4537/12223451/03d2f008e730/resprot_v14i1e59126_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4537/12223451/03d2f008e730/resprot_v14i1e59126_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4537/12223451/03d2f008e730/resprot_v14i1e59126_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Design for Developing and Integrating a Model of Care for Pain Management Centers: Protocol for a Biphase Qualitative Study.共同设计疼痛管理中心护理模式的开发与整合:双阶段定性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 18;14:e59126. doi: 10.2196/59126.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Does interdisciplinary group care for the treatment of endometriosis improve pain interference: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial at an urban academic medical centre.跨学科小组护理对子宫内膜异位症治疗的疼痛干扰改善情况:城市学术医疗中心一项试点随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e097372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097372.
5
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
Integrated Psychosocial Care in Intensive Care (IPS-Pilot): Protocol for the Systematic, Multimethod Development of a Complex Intervention (Phase A).重症监护中的综合心理社会护理(IPS-试点项目):复杂干预措施的系统多方法开发方案(A阶段)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 6;14:e65682. doi: 10.2196/65682.
10
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.

本文引用的文献

1
Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.管理非特异性下腰痛的护理模式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 7;3(3):CD015083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015083.pub2.
2
Testing a model for person-centred pain management: A systematic review and synthesis guided by the Fundamentals of Care framework.测试以患者为中心的疼痛管理模型:以关怀基本要素框架为指导的系统评价和综合研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):6811-6831. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16770. Epub 2023 May 27.
3
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.
融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.
4
Management of Chronic Pain in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.长期护理中的慢性疼痛管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Sep;23(9):1507-1516.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Co-Produce, Co-Design, Co-Create, or Co-Construct-Who Does It and How Is It Done in Chronic Disease Prevention? A Scoping Review.共同生产、共同设计、共同创造或共同构建——谁来做以及如何在慢性病预防中实施?一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;10(4):647. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040647.
6
Practical Recommendations for Youth Care Professionals to Improve Evaluation and Reflection During Multidisciplinary Team Discussions: An Action Research Project.青年护理专业人员在多学科团队讨论中改进评估与反思的实用建议:一项行动研究项目
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5639. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
7
Patients' experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a qualitative interview study.患者在初级保健中体验 BetterBack 模型治疗腰痛的经历——一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1861719. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719.
8
The STarT Back stratified care model for nonspecific low back pain: a model-based evaluation of long-term cost-effectiveness.基于 STarT Back 分层诊疗模型的非特异性下腰痛长期成本-效果分析
Pain. 2021 Mar 1;162(3):702-710. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002057.
9
Flipping the Pain Care Model: A Sociopsychobiological Approach to High-Value Chronic Pain Care.翻转疼痛护理模式:一种针对高价值慢性疼痛护理的社会心理生物学方法。
Pain Med. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):1168-1180. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz336.
10
What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research.哪些因素会影响饱和度?焦点小组研究中的样本量估计。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.