Suppr超能文献

重症监护中的综合心理社会护理(IPS-试点项目):复杂干预措施的系统多方法开发方案(A阶段)

Integrated Psychosocial Care in Intensive Care (IPS-Pilot): Protocol for the Systematic, Multimethod Development of a Complex Intervention (Phase A).

作者信息

Nickel Sophie Felicitas, Korger Simone, Schindler Wencke, Heytens Heike, Krieg Gironimo, Drewitz Karl-Philipp, Schürmann Katrin, Schössow Leon, Gehrig Julianna, Binneböse Marius, Hirning Christian, Hönig Klaus, Niessen Rolf Konstantin, Kirschbaum Julia, Erdur Laurence, Peter Sophie, Junne Florian, Rose Matthias, Apfelbacher Christian, Gündel Harald

机构信息

Clinic of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research (ISMHSR), Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 6;14:e65682. doi: 10.2196/65682.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a high, co-dependent strain on health care professionals (HCPs), patients, and their relatives in intensive care units (ICUs), leading to long-term mental, physical, and occupational consequences. To date, there is no systematic intervention to address this growing problem.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the IPS-Pilot (German: Integrierte Psychosoziale Versorgung; English: "Integrated Psychosocial Care") project is the development (phase A) and pilot testing (phase B) of an integrated and complex psychosocial care intervention for HCPs, patients, and their relatives in ICUs. This study protocol focuses on phase A. A separate protocol for phase B will be published later.

METHODS

A structured, multimethod approach was used to gather evidence from the target groups mentioned above on the needs, expected benefits, and necessary conditions for implementation. These methods included (1) a scoping umbrella review conducted by 2 researchers, who independently screened and selected reviews and meta-analyses in the field of needs and demands in the ICU setting, following the Levac framework; (2) web-based and face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions, which were coded independently by 2 researchers and analyzed using qualitative content analysis; the identified categories and codes were then quantified by (3) an online survey conducted with former ICU patients, their relatives, HCPs working in ICUs, and members of the general population. Synthesized results-complemented by the theories of Psychosocial Safety Climate and Conservation of Resources, as well as online and face-to-face stakeholder workshops-were used for intervention development, which was guided by the Intervention Mapping framework.

RESULTS

Through the 4 substudies, we aim to gain insights into the psychosocial needs of the aforementioned target groups. Intermediate analyses were conducted to develop both a model of the problem and a model illustrating how these needs can be effectively addressed through a psychosocial intervention that involves integrating a clinically trained psychologist into the HCP team. Data collection and analysis for the intervention development were completed by June 2024, including substudy 1 (n=104 included articles), substudy 2 (n=22 interviews and n=18 participants in focus groups), substudy 3 (n=237 survey participants), and substudy 4 (n=11, n=15, and n=20 participants in 3 consecutive workshops), with further analyses still ongoing beyond the scope of intervention development. The results of the substudies, as well as the final needs-based intervention design, will be published separately. These findings form the basis for the feasibility study (phase B), conducted from July 2024 to July 2025, during which the intervention will be implemented in randomly selected ICU wards and evaluated in terms of feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase B will assess the feasibility of the IPS intervention. The findings will be incorporated into the intervention design and serve as the basis for a future randomized controlled trial to evaluate its efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OSF Registries 10.17605/OSF.IO/VFXJK; https://osf.io/vfxjk.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/65682.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)对医护人员、患者及其亲属造成了高度的、相互依存的压力,导致长期的心理、身体和职业后果。迄今为止,尚无系统的干预措施来解决这一日益严重的问题。

目的

IPS试点项目(德语:Integrierte Psychosoziale Versorgung;英语:“综合心理社会护理”)的目标是为ICU中的医护人员、患者及其亲属开发(A阶段)并进行综合复杂心理社会护理干预的试点测试(B阶段)。本研究方案聚焦于A阶段。B阶段的单独方案将在稍后发布。

方法

采用结构化、多方法的方式,从上述目标群体中收集关于需求、预期益处和实施必要条件的证据。这些方法包括:(1)由2名研究人员进行的范围伞状综述,他们按照Levac框架独立筛选和选择ICU环境中需求和要求领域的综述及荟萃分析;(2)基于网络和面对面的访谈以及焦点小组讨论,由2名研究人员独立编码并使用定性内容分析进行分析;然后通过(3)对前ICU患者、其亲属、在ICU工作的医护人员以及普通人群成员进行的在线调查对确定的类别和代码进行量化。综合结果——辅之以心理社会安全气候理论和资源守恒理论,以及在线和面对面的利益相关者研讨会——用于干预开发,干预开发以干预映射框架为指导。

结果

通过这4项子研究,我们旨在深入了解上述目标群体的心理社会需求。进行了中期分析,以建立问题模型以及说明如何通过将临床训练有素的心理学家纳入医护人员团队的心理社会干预有效满足这些需求的模型构建。干预开发的数据收集和分析于2024年6月完成,包括子研究1(纳入104篇文章)、子研究2(22次访谈和18名焦点小组参与者)、子研究3(237名调查参与者)以及子研究4(连续3次研讨会的11名、15名和20名参与者),超出干预开发范围的进一步分析仍在进行中。子研究结果以及最终基于需求的干预设计将单独发表。这些发现构成了2024年7月至2025年7月进行的可行性研究(B阶段)的基础,在此期间,干预将在随机选择的ICU病房实施,并就可行性进行评估。

结论

B阶段将评估IPS干预的可行性。研究结果将纳入干预设计,并作为未来评估其疗效的随机对照试验的基础。

试验注册

OSF注册库10.17605/OSF.IO/VFXJK;https://osf.io/vfxjk。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR1-10.2196/65682。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b9/12181753/2c2d448fdd1b/resprot_v14i1e65682_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验