Chiu Yi-Ting
Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, 3351 Fairfax Drive, Van Metre Hall, Arlington, Virginia 22201, USA.
J Aging Res. 2025 Jun 12;2025:5295292. doi: 10.1155/jare/5295292. eCollection 2025.
This study offers the first in-depth analysis of the Village Movement since its launch in 2002, examining the socioeconomic and institutional factors behind the growth and sustainability of Villages, community-based organizations that support aging in place. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research combines survey data, case studies, interviews, field observations, and regression analysis. Findings show that Villages are grassroots' responses to the breakdown of traditional social networks in modern, urbanized societies. They help rebuild community ties, reduce isolation, and provide older adults with both services and a renewed sense of purpose. Key drivers of Village development include human capital, civic engagement, spatial proximity, and support from existing organizations. While strong local networks can sometimes reduce the need for Villages, communities with looser ties often have greater motivation to establish them. The study also challenges the perception that Villages are expensive or exclusive. Many operate with low or no membership fees, and alternative models, such as affiliated or hub-and-spoke Villages, allow for growth in lower income and minority communities. Government support, while not essential, can complement Village efforts, particularly during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the Village model proves adaptable and resilient, capable of filling service gaps while strengthening community cohesion. It offers a flexible, community-driven solution to the challenges of aging in a rapidly changing society.
本研究首次对自2002年启动以来的村庄运动进行了深入分析,考察了村庄(即支持就地养老的社区组织)发展和可持续性背后的社会经济和制度因素。该研究采用混合研究方法,结合了调查数据、案例研究、访谈、实地观察和回归分析。研究结果表明,村庄是现代城市化社会中对传统社会网络瓦解的基层回应。它们有助于重建社区联系、减少孤立感,并为老年人提供服务和重新找回目标感。村庄发展的关键驱动因素包括人力资本、公民参与、空间邻近性以及现有组织的支持。虽然强大的地方网络有时会减少对村庄的需求,但联系较松散的社区建立村庄的动力往往更强。该研究还挑战了那种认为村庄成本高昂或具有排他性的观念。许多村庄的运营收费很低或不收费,而且附属型或中心辐射型村庄等替代模式能够促进低收入社区和少数族裔社区的发展。政府支持虽非必不可少,但可以补充村庄的努力,尤其是在新冠疫情等危机期间。总体而言,村庄模式证明具有适应性和韧性,能够在填补服务空白的同时增强社区凝聚力。它为快速变化的社会中应对老龄化挑战提供了一种灵活的、由社区驱动的解决方案。