• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体与青少年心理健康:平台及政策建议的范围综述

Social Media and Youth Mental Health: Scoping Review of Platform and Policy Recommendations.

作者信息

Chhabra Jasleen, Pilkington Vita, Benakovic Ruben, Wilson Michael James, La Sala Louise, Seidler Zac

机构信息

Centre of Youth Mental Health, Orygen Youth Health, Footscray, Australia.

Movember Foundation, East Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e72061. doi: 10.2196/72061.

DOI:10.2196/72061
PMID:40540734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12228008/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High rates of social media use and mental ill-health among young people have drawn significant public, policy, and research concern. Rapid technological advancements and changes in platform design have outpaced our understanding of the health effects of social media and hampered timely evidence-based regulatory responses. While a proliferation of recommendations to social media companies and governments has been published, a comprehensive summary of recommendations for protecting young people's mental health and digital safety does not yet exist.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review synthesized published recommendations for social media companies and governments in relation to young people's (aged 12-25 years) mental health. A qualitative approach was used to undertake inductive content analysis, where recommendations were grouped under conceptually similar themes.

METHODS

We searched academic (PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO) and nonacademic (Overton and Google) databases for relevant documents. Eligible documents provided recommendations to regulators and social media companies that pertained to social media, young people, and mental health. This review excluded recommendations for young people, caregivers, educators, or clinicians surrounding strategies for managing individual social media use; instead, the recommendations emphasized the regulation or design of social media products and practices of social media companies. Peer-reviewed and gray literature from selected Western contexts (Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States) were relevant for inclusion. Documents were published between January 2020 and September 2024.

RESULTS

Of the identified 4980 unique reports, 120 (2.41%) progressed to full-text screening, and 70 (1.41%) met the inclusion criteria. Five interrelated themes were identified: (1) legislating and overseeing accountability, (2) transparency, (3) collaboration, (4) safety by design, and (5) restricting young people's access to social media.

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasizes the need for multipronged approaches to address the rapidly increasing presence and reach of social media platforms in the lives of young people. These recommendations provide practical and tangible paths forward for governments and industry, backed by expert organizations in youth mental health and technology regulation at a time when expert-informed guidance is sorely needed. Rigorous evaluation of the proposed recommendations is needed while continuing to build on the emerging peer-reviewed evidence base that should form the foundation of policy and regulatory changes.

摘要

背景

年轻人中社交媒体使用率高和心理健康问题严重引起了公众、政策制定者和研究界的极大关注。技术的快速进步和平台设计的变化超出了我们对社交媒体健康影响的理解,阻碍了及时基于证据的监管应对。虽然已经发布了大量给社交媒体公司和政府的建议,但尚未有一份全面总结保护年轻人心理健康和数字安全建议的报告。

目的

本范围综述综合了已发表的针对社交媒体公司和政府的与年轻人(12至25岁)心理健康相关的建议。采用定性方法进行归纳内容分析,将建议归为概念上相似的主题。

方法

我们在学术数据库(PubMed、Scopus和PsycINFO)和非学术数据库(Overton和谷歌)中搜索相关文献。符合条件的文献向监管机构和社交媒体公司提供了与社交媒体、年轻人和心理健康相关的建议。本综述排除了围绕管理个人社交媒体使用策略给年轻人、照顾者、教育工作者或临床医生的建议;相反,这些建议强调了社交媒体产品的监管或设计以及社交媒体公司的做法。来自选定西方背景(澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国)的同行评审文献和灰色文献符合纳入标准。文献发表时间为2020年1月至2024年9月。

结果

在识别出的4980份独特报告中,120份(2.41%)进入全文筛选,70份(1.41%)符合纳入标准。确定了五个相互关联的主题:(1)立法和监督问责制,(2)透明度,(3)合作,(4)设计安全,(5)限制年轻人使用社交媒体。

结论

本综述强调需要采取多管齐下的方法来应对社交媒体平台在年轻人生活中迅速增加的存在和影响力。这些建议为政府和行业提供了切实可行的前进道路,在急需专家指导的时候,有青年心理健康和技术监管方面的专业组织提供支持。在继续以新兴的同行评审证据为基础(这应成为政策和监管变革的基础)的同时,需要对所提建议进行严格评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62f/12228008/707b7edf607f/jmir_v27i1e72061_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62f/12228008/df4b69389eac/jmir_v27i1e72061_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62f/12228008/707b7edf607f/jmir_v27i1e72061_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62f/12228008/df4b69389eac/jmir_v27i1e72061_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b62f/12228008/707b7edf607f/jmir_v27i1e72061_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Media and Youth Mental Health: Scoping Review of Platform and Policy Recommendations.社交媒体与青少年心理健康:平台及政策建议的范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e72061. doi: 10.2196/72061.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
9
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
10
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women.用于治疗符合抗逆转录病毒治疗条件的孕妇艾滋病毒感染的抗逆转录病毒疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008440.

本文引用的文献

1
Online Safety When Considering Self-Harm and Suicide-Related Content: Qualitative Focus Group Study With Young People, Policy Makers, and Social Media Industry Professionals.考虑与自我伤害和自杀相关内容时的网络安全:针对年轻人、政策制定者和社交媒体行业专业人士的定性焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e66321. doi: 10.2196/66321.
2
The steps that young people and suicide prevention professionals think the social media industry and policymakers should take to improve online safety. A nested cross-sectional study within a Delphi consensus approach.年轻人和自杀预防专业人士认为社交媒体行业和政策制定者应采取的改善网络安全的措施。德尔菲共识方法下的嵌套横断面研究。
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 15;2:1274263. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2023.1274263. eCollection 2023.
3
Ten Myths About the Effect of Social Media Use on Well-Being.社交媒体使用对幸福感影响的十大误区。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e59585. doi: 10.2196/59585.
4
Does TikTok contribute to eating disorders? A comparison of the TikTok algorithms belonging to individuals with eating disorders versus healthy controls.TikTok 会导致饮食失调吗?对患有饮食失调症的个体与健康对照组的 TikTok 算法进行比较。
Body Image. 2024 Dec;51:101807. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101807. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
5
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health.《柳叶刀》青少年心理健康委员会
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;11(9):731-774. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00163-9.
6
Who's most at risk? A person-centered approach to understanding the long-term relationship between early social media use and later depression across adolescence.谁的风险最大?一种以人为中心的方法,用于理解青少年时期早期社交媒体使用与后来抑郁之间的长期关系。
J Adolesc. 2024 Oct;96(7):1555-1568. doi: 10.1002/jad.12362. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
7
Social media and adolescent mental health: A consensus report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.社交媒体与青少年心理健康:美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的共识报告。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 27;3(2):pgae037. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae037. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
The Impact of Social Media on the Mental Health of Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.社交媒体对青少年和青年心理健康的影响:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42990. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42990. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.社交媒体的社会驱动因素和算法机制。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Sep;19(5):735-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185057. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
10
The Relationship between Social Media and the Increase in Mental Health Problems.社交媒体与心理健康问题增加之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032383.