• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于基于DRIVE模型的文本心理健康检测的人工智能框架:以COVID-19期间应对策略的表达方式为例

AI framework for DRIVE model based mental health detection in text: a case study on how coping strategies are expressed during COVID-19.

作者信息

AlSumait Loulwah, AlFarhan Altaf, AlHeneidi Hasah

机构信息

Department of Information Science, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

Liberal Arts Department, American University of the Middle East, Egaila, Kuwait.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Apr 25;11:e2828. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2828. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2828
PMID:40567765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12190600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article defines an artificial intelligence framework to detect individual's mental health (MH) status on social networks. The proposed framework, which consists of four main modules, aims to analyze the emotions that are expressed by social network users in their text posts and identify their mental coping strategies, resources, and demands based on The Demands-Resources-Individual Effects (DRIVE) model. Although sentiment analysis (SA) is effective in analyzing the polarity of the text, it is limited in detecting the mental health status in terms of the coping strategies, available resources, or encountered stressors. This study illustrates such limitations in detecting the coping strategies and shows the effectiveness of the coping-based analysis. The work also reveals the phrases and topics that were used by individuals to express their coping strategies which provides a novel outlook of the individuals' psychological coping within their environment.

METHODS

The social network X is used to collect the coping strategies expressed by people who experienced stress during COVID-19 from November 2019 to May 2022. Text was processed using natural language processing (NLP). A sample of posts was coded into a positive or negative coping category and one of eight subtypes. SA and statistical analysis were performed to compare SA results with coded coping strategies. Latent Dirichlet Allocation and bigram NLP were applied to identify main themes and terminologies. Coping classification models were created and tested.

RESULTS

The findings reveal that 70% of posts show positive coping strategies. The main positive coping themes included self-care, seeking help, positive reframing, engaging in prayers and meditation, employing humor through sarcasm, and implementing a practical mindset. Conversely, the remaining 30% of posts expressed negative coping themes, such as conspiracy thoughts, wishful or hopeless thinking, and negative perceptions. The coping classification models achieved a reliable predictive level with an average accuracy of 74.8%. Categorizing coping strategies using SA methods, particularly TextBlob and VADER, revealed high miscategorization rates, especially for negative coping strategies. Bigrams and LDA analysis identified distinct word patterns in positive and negative coping strategies, with emojis playing a significant role in emotional expression across both categories.

CONCLUSION

The article defined a framework for a MH detector based on the DRIVE model. It highlighted the resilience and adaptive responses of individuals in times of crisis. It also focused on coping and identified physical, emotional, and social support and positive reframing as major positive strategies; and the spread of false information and loss of social support as negative coping strategies. The applied coping classification models showed reliable performance in distinguishing between positive and negative coping categories.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/5e89ea3a1b32/peerj-cs-11-2828-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/08ab02ab350d/peerj-cs-11-2828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7cc7b4f277a6/peerj-cs-11-2828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7325c02c3876/peerj-cs-11-2828-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/b3f54b836d74/peerj-cs-11-2828-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7880150d5019/peerj-cs-11-2828-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/d132766ba80a/peerj-cs-11-2828-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7f077de09c75/peerj-cs-11-2828-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/fbaddb11a0cc/peerj-cs-11-2828-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7e46f8e95cf0/peerj-cs-11-2828-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/5e89ea3a1b32/peerj-cs-11-2828-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/08ab02ab350d/peerj-cs-11-2828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7cc7b4f277a6/peerj-cs-11-2828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7325c02c3876/peerj-cs-11-2828-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/b3f54b836d74/peerj-cs-11-2828-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7880150d5019/peerj-cs-11-2828-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/d132766ba80a/peerj-cs-11-2828-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7f077de09c75/peerj-cs-11-2828-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/fbaddb11a0cc/peerj-cs-11-2828-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/7e46f8e95cf0/peerj-cs-11-2828-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9b1/12190600/5e89ea3a1b32/peerj-cs-11-2828-g010.jpg
摘要

背景

本文定义了一个人工智能框架,用于在社交网络上检测个人的心理健康(MH)状况。所提出的框架由四个主要模块组成,旨在分析社交网络用户在文本帖子中表达的情绪,并根据需求 - 资源 - 个体效应(DRIVE)模型识别他们的心理应对策略、资源和需求。尽管情感分析(SA)在分析文本的极性方面很有效,但在检测心理健康状况方面,在应对策略、可用资源或遇到的压力源方面存在局限性。本研究说明了在检测应对策略方面的此类局限性,并展示了基于应对的分析的有效性。这项工作还揭示了个人用来表达其应对策略的短语和主题,这为个人在其环境中的心理应对提供了新的视角。

方法

使用社交网络X收集2019年11月至2022年5月期间在新冠疫情期间经历压力的人们所表达的应对策略。使用自然语言处理(NLP)对文本进行处理。将一部分帖子编码为积极或消极应对类别以及八种亚型之一。进行情感分析和统计分析,以将情感分析结果与编码的应对策略进行比较。应用潜在狄利克雷分配和二元语法自然语言处理来识别主要主题和术语。创建并测试应对分类模型。

结果

研究结果表明,70%的帖子显示出积极的应对策略。主要的积极应对主题包括自我照顾、寻求帮助、积极重新构建、进行祈祷和冥想、通过讽刺运用幽默以及采取务实的心态。相反,其余30%的帖子表达了消极应对主题,如阴谋论想法、一厢情愿或绝望的想法以及消极看法。应对分类模型达到了可靠的预测水平,平均准确率为74.8%。使用情感分析方法(特别是TextBlob和VADER)对应对策略进行分类,显示出较高的错误分类率,尤其是对于消极应对策略。二元语法和潜在狄利克雷分配分析在积极和消极应对策略中识别出不同的词模式,表情符号在两类情感表达中都发挥了重要作用。

结论

本文定义了一个基于DRIVE模型的心理健康检测器框架。它强调了个人在危机时期的恢复力和适应性反应。它还关注应对,并确定身体、情感和社会支持以及积极重新构建为主要的积极策略;而虚假信息的传播和社会支持的丧失为消极应对策略。所应用的应对分类模型在区分积极和消极应对类别方面表现出可靠的性能。

相似文献

1
AI framework for DRIVE model based mental health detection in text: a case study on how coping strategies are expressed during COVID-19.用于基于DRIVE模型的文本心理健康检测的人工智能框架:以COVID-19期间应对策略的表达方式为例
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Apr 25;11:e2828. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2828. eCollection 2025.
2
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Public Perception of the Brain-Computer Interface Based on a Decade of Data on X: Mixed Methods Study.基于X平台十年数据的公众对脑机接口的认知:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 25;9:e60859. doi: 10.2196/60859.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of the use of topic models for short text social media analysis.对主题模型用于短文本社交媒体分析的系统综述。
Artif Intell Rev. 2023 May 1:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10471-x.
2
Automatic Detection of Twitter Users Who Express Chronic Stress Experiences via Supervised Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing.基于监督机器学习和自然语言处理的 Twitter 用户慢性应激体验自动检测。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Sep 1;41(9):717-724. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000985.
3
Social media use, stress, and coping.社交媒体使用、压力和应对方式。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Jun;45:101305. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101305. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Differential privacy in health research: A scoping review.健康研究中的差分隐私:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2269-2276. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab135.
5
Effects of Social Media Use on Psychological Well-Being: A Mediated Model.社交媒体使用对心理健康的影响:一个中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 21;12:678766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678766. eCollection 2021.
6
Resilience and coping strategies in relation to mental health outcomes in people with cancer.癌症患者的心理健康结果与韧性和应对策略的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 May 24;16(5):e0252075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252075. eCollection 2021.
7
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.隔离的心理影响及其减轻方法:快速综述证据。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Forecasting the onset and course of mental illness with Twitter data.利用 Twitter 数据预测精神疾病的发病和病程。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 11;7(1):13006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12961-9.
9
Ethnicity, work-related stress and subjective reports of health by migrant workers: a multi-dimensional model.族群、与工作相关的压力和移民工人的主观健康报告:一个多维模型。
Ethn Health. 2018 Feb;23(2):174-193. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2016.1258041. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Mental health nursing students' experiences of stress during training: a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.精神科护理专业学生在培训期间的压力体验:质性访谈的主题分析
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Dec;22(10):773-83. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12273. Epub 2015 Oct 12.