Imhoff Eric Daniel, Melnyk Andrii, Rinaldi-Ramos Carlos M
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
J Magn Magn Mater. 2025 May 15;620. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.172889. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
Commercial magnetic particle imaging (MPI) tracers are utilized for many applications including as reference materials for comparing tracer performance, but comparative measurements of many tracers on a single imaging platform are uncommon. This study uses relaxometry and 2D imaging in a pre-clinical MOMENTUM scanner to characterize and evaluate the performance of six common commercial tracers for MPI: Synomag-D Plain, Synomag-D NH2, Synomag-D PEG, Perimag, Vivotrax, and Vivotrax Plus. Repeated measurements of samples showed considerable variability while inter-sample differences were generally negligible. Sensitivity between the two modes is strongly correlated while resolution of the two modes was only moderately correlated. Further, relaxometric measurements tend to predict better resolution than is achieved in 2D imaging. All evaluated tracers have resolutions within 1 mm of each other on the MOMENTUM imager. These results illustrate that relaxometer measurements can be used to broadly predict MPI performance but do not accurately recreate the physical processes or differences in hardware and software of MPI. This study provides MPI measurements of tracers that may be useful to researchers while highlighting the challenges of making comparisons between tracers due to variation within samples and across different measurement techniques and instruments.
商用磁粒子成像(MPI)示踪剂被用于许多应用,包括作为比较示踪剂性能的参考材料,但在单个成像平台上对多种示踪剂进行比较测量并不常见。本研究在一台临床前的MOMENTUM扫描仪中使用弛豫测量法和二维成像来表征和评估六种常见的商用MPI示踪剂的性能:Synomag-D Plain、Synomag-D NH2、Synomag-D PEG、Perimag、Vivotrax和Vivotrax Plus。对样品的重复测量显示出相当大的变异性,而样品间的差异通常可以忽略不计。两种模式之间的灵敏度高度相关,而两种模式的分辨率仅呈中度相关。此外,弛豫测量法往往比二维成像能更好地预测分辨率。在MOMENTUM成像仪上,所有评估的示踪剂的分辨率彼此相差都在1毫米以内。这些结果表明,弛豫测量法可用于广泛预测MPI性能,但不能准确重现MPI的物理过程或硬件和软件方面的差异。本研究提供了示踪剂的MPI测量结果,这可能对研究人员有用,同时突出了由于样品内部以及不同测量技术和仪器之间的差异而在示踪剂之间进行比较时所面临的挑战。