Matomäki Pekka
Paavo Nurmi Centre & Unit for Health and Physical Activity, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05843-w.
Endurance athletes prioritize most of their training in low-intensity zone. This forms a paradox, as immediate logic would argue against it: Acutely low-intensity exercise does not challenge the homeostasis or cardiopulmonary system of high-level athletes sufficiently to produce performance gains comparable to those from moderate- or high-intensity exercise. In this perspective study, seven possible explanations for the purpose of excessive-volume low-intensity training in endurance athletes are proposed. The hypotheses are not all mutually exclusive. They range from a psychological need for easy days and the incremental benefits of low-intensity training without accumulating stress, to the possibility that such training may ultimately be replaceable.
耐力运动员将大部分训练安排在低强度区间。这形成了一个悖论,因为直观逻辑会对此提出反对:高强度运动员进行急性低强度运动时,对其体内平衡或心肺系统的挑战不足以产生与中等强度或高强度运动相当的成绩提升。在这项前瞻性研究中,针对耐力运动员进行大量低强度训练的目的,提出了七种可能的解释。这些假设并非完全相互排斥。它们涵盖了从对轻松训练日的心理需求、低强度训练在不累积压力情况下的渐进益处,到这种训练最终可能被替代的可能性。