• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字医疗时代健康数据的开放共享运行机制:基于扎根理论和解释结构模型法的研究

The open sharing operation mechanism of health data in the digital healthcare era: A study based on grounded theory and interpretative structural modeling method.

作者信息

Huang Xinping, Zhu Siyuan, Lv Zheng, Zhou Qianwen, Kou Tianqi

机构信息

School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

National Intelligent Social Governance Research Institute of Jilin University, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2025 Jun 25;11:20552076251353694. doi: 10.1177/20552076251353694. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076251353694
PMID:40585050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202922/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the evolving digital healthcare landscape, the strategic exploitation of open health data has become increasingly pivotal. The open sharing of health data is essential due to its irreplaceable role in digital health care. It is made feasible by the development of emerging technologies and the support of national policies. However, in practice, health data systems continue to face challenges such as data fragmentation, uneven data quality, poor platform connectivity, and a data regulatory vacuum, all of which hinder the effective integration of healthcare resources. This study proposes a health data governance framework to align stakeholder incentives, clarify operational responsibilities, and facilitate the compliant sharing and reuse of health data.

METHODS

Innovatively employing grounded theory, this study meticulously examines the critical elements that influence health data sharing and provides a comprehensive explanation of its operational mechanisms through the Interpretive Structural Modeling - Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification model, delves into the operational mechanisms from three perspectives: the interest-driven and coordinated actions of multiple stakeholders, the open flow and secure sharing of the data ontology, and the internal support and external guarantees provided by the environmental context.

RESULTS

This study proposes a structured data governance framework, establishing a health data sharing system built upon four core components: top-level guidance, collaborative governance, technological empowerment, and rights protection. By standardizing data quality assessment, enhancing platform interoperability, unifying data exchange protocols, and addressing critical regulatory gaps, the framework offers a systematic solution to the key challenges associated with open health data sharing.

CONCLUSION

This study advocates an open health data-sharing framework characterized by "top-level guidance, collaborative governance, technological empowerment, and robust rights protection." Such a framework will optimize the economic and social value of open health data, address existing challenges, and harness future opportunities to create a more inclusive and efficient healthcare system.

摘要

目的

在不断发展的数字医疗格局中,对开放健康数据进行战略利用变得越来越关键。健康数据的开放共享至关重要,因为其在数字医疗中具有不可替代的作用。新兴技术的发展和国家政策的支持使其成为可能。然而,在实践中,健康数据系统仍面临数据碎片化、数据质量参差不齐、平台连通性差以及数据监管真空等挑战,所有这些都阻碍了医疗资源的有效整合。本研究提出了一个健康数据治理框架,以协调利益相关者的激励措施,明确运营责任,并促进健康数据的合规共享和再利用。

方法

本研究创新性地运用扎根理论,细致考察影响健康数据共享的关键要素,并通过解释结构模型-交叉影响矩阵乘法应用于分类模型对其运行机制进行全面解释,从三个角度深入探讨运行机制:多个利益相关者的利益驱动与协同行动、数据本体的开放流动与安全共享以及环境背景提供的内部支持和外部保障。

结果

本研究提出了一个结构化的数据治理框架,建立了一个基于四个核心组件的健康数据共享系统:顶层指导、协同治理、技术赋能和权益保护。通过规范数据质量评估、增强平台互操作性、统一数据交换协议以及解决关键监管漏洞,该框架为与开放健康数据共享相关的关键挑战提供了系统解决方案。

结论

本研究倡导一个以“顶层指导、协同治理、技术赋能、有力权益保护”为特征的开放健康数据共享框架。这样一个框架将优化开放健康数据的经济和社会价值,应对现有挑战,并利用未来机遇创建一个更具包容性和高效的医疗体系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/e49ffb69a2fd/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/90e9727c8b70/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/c0eec7de3336/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/9bf8396c7a20/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/419e4089227b/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/9e22b4e660f4/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/7b43568468a3/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/55c22a9a25a1/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/b4de78534cfe/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/e49ffb69a2fd/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/90e9727c8b70/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/c0eec7de3336/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/9bf8396c7a20/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/419e4089227b/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/9e22b4e660f4/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/7b43568468a3/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/55c22a9a25a1/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/b4de78534cfe/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee4/12202922/e49ffb69a2fd/10.1177_20552076251353694-fig9.jpg

相似文献

1
The open sharing operation mechanism of health data in the digital healthcare era: A study based on grounded theory and interpretative structural modeling method.数字医疗时代健康数据的开放共享运行机制:基于扎根理论和解释结构模型法的研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 25;11:20552076251353694. doi: 10.1177/20552076251353694. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.
6
Adjustmentalisation - digitalisation as transformation process and the interplay between a digital logic and diverse primary care logics in Sweden.调整数字化——作为转型过程的数字化以及瑞典数字逻辑与多种初级保健逻辑之间的相互作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 25;39(5):744-763. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
10
Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.人为因素对医疗机构网络安全的影响:系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;21(15):5119. doi: 10.3390/s21155119.

本文引用的文献

1
A model for predicting factors affecting health information avoidance on WeChat.一个用于预测影响微信健康信息回避因素的模型。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 13;11:20552076251314277. doi: 10.1177/20552076251314277. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
A Qualitative Study of Physicians' Views on the Reuse of Electronic Health Record Data for Secondary Analysis.关于医生对电子健康记录数据二次分析复用观点的定性研究。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Jun 3:10497323241245644. doi: 10.1177/10497323241245644.
3
Decentralised, collaborative, and privacy-preserving machine learning for multi-hospital data.
去中心化、协作和保护隐私的机器学习,适用于多医院数据。
EBioMedicine. 2024 Mar;101:105006. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105006. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Public Preferences for Digital Health Data Sharing: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in 12 European Countries.公众对数字健康数据共享的偏好:12 个欧洲国家的离散选择实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e47066. doi: 10.2196/47066.
5
Where's the Disconnect? Exploring Pathways to Healthcare Coordinated for Youth Experiencing Homelessness in Toronto, Canada, Using Grounded Theory Methodology.脱节之处在哪?运用扎根理论方法,探索加拿大多伦多为无家可归青年提供协调一致的医疗保健途径。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Mar;34(4):298-310. doi: 10.1177/10497323231208417. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Public and Patients' Perspectives Towards Data and Sample Sharing for Research: An Overview of Empirical Findings.公众和患者对研究中数据和样本共享的看法:实证研究综述。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Dec;18(5):319-345. doi: 10.1177/15562646231212644. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Multiple modes of data sharing can facilitate secondary use of sensitive health data for research.多种数据共享模式可以促进敏感健康数据的二次利用,用于研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013092.
8
Collaborative measurement of data opening policy in China's municipal government data management system: Taking a regional central city as an example.中国市级政府数据管理制度中数据开放政策的协同度量:以区域中心城市为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289550. eCollection 2023.
9
Development of an Evidence-Based Conceptual Model of the Health Care Sector Under Digital Transformation: Integrative Review.数字转型下医疗保健领域循证概念模型的开发:综合评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 8;25:e41512. doi: 10.2196/41512.
10
Data Sharing and Global Public Health: Defining What We Mean by Data.数据共享与全球公共卫生:界定我们所说的数据的含义
Front Digit Health. 2020 Dec 14;2:612339. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.612339. eCollection 2020.