• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

(未)在医院环境中得到照料:从福柯的视角看患者的经历。

(Not) Being cared for in hospital settings: patients' experience from Foucault's perspective.

作者信息

Soares Débora Thais Siqueira, Lacerda Maria Ribeiro, Hermann Ana Paula

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Paraná. Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Jun 30;78(2):e20240198. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0198. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0198
PMID:40608653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12221270/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

to understand patients' experience of (lack of) care in hospital settings from Foucault's perspective.

METHODS

this is the partial result of research using Grounded Theory as a methodological framework, in light of Michel Foucault's theoretical framework. Data collection was carried out with 30 participants.

RESULTS

theoretical concepts "enjoying safe care" emerged, composed of subconcepts "receiving safe care" and "feeling safe to engage in care", and "identifying unsafe care", with subconcepts "recognizing risks" and "feeling insecure".

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

by amplifying patients' voice, it was possible to capture their needs and reflect on which aspects are a reference of (in)security for them. Understanding the relations of power, knowledge and discipline in hospital settings, in light of Foucault, highlighted the complexity of interactions in care provision, favoring leading role and empowering patients for their care.

摘要

目标

从福柯的视角理解患者在医院环境中(缺乏)护理的体验。

方法

这是一项以扎根理论为方法框架、参照米歇尔·福柯理论框架开展研究的部分成果。对30名参与者进行了数据收集。

结果

出现了理论概念“享受安全护理”,由子概念“接受安全护理”和“放心接受护理”以及“识别不安全护理”组成,后者又包含子概念“认识风险”和“感到不安全”。

最终思考

通过放大患者的声音,有可能了解他们的需求,并思考哪些方面对他们而言是(不)安全的参照。根据福柯的观点理解医院环境中的权力、知识和规训关系,凸显了护理提供中互动的复杂性,有利于发挥患者的主导作用并增强其自我护理能力。

相似文献

1
(Not) Being cared for in hospital settings: patients' experience from Foucault's perspective.(未)在医院环境中得到照料:从福柯的视角看患者的经历。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Jun 30;78(2):e20240198. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0198. eCollection 2025.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
4
Patient perspective on observation methods used in seclusion room in an Irish forensic mental health setting: A qualitative study.患者对爱尔兰法医精神健康环境中隔离室所使用的观察方法的看法:一项定性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):393-404. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12979. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Patient Transfer Process From Pre-Hospital to the Hospital Emergency Department: A Grounded Theory Study.从院前到医院急诊科的患者转运过程:一项扎根理论研究。
Nurs Open. 2025 Jul;12(7):e70190. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70190.
8
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.

本文引用的文献

1
Experience of the patient regarding their safety in the hospital environment.患者在医院环境中的安全体验。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Oct 9;76(5):e20220512. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0512. eCollection 2023.
2
Can care coordination across levels be improved through the implementation of participatory action research interventions? Outcomes and conditions for sustaining changes in five Latin American countries.能否通过实施参与式行动研究干预措施来改善各级之间的护理协调?在五个拉丁美洲国家中维持变革的结果和条件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05781-7.
3
Care for the critical patient undergoing point-of-care testing: integrative review.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(6):e20180948. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0948. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
Satisfaction attributes related to safety and quality perceived in the experience of hospitalized patients.与住院患者体验中感知到的安全和质量相关的满意度属性。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019 Nov 25;41(spe):e20190152. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190152. eCollection 2020.
5
Safety of the patient in an emergency situation: perceptions of the nursing team.紧急情况下患者的安全:护理团队的认知
Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Jun 27;72(3):753-759. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0544.
6
Data analysis: comparison between the different methodological perspectives of the Grounded Theory.数据分析:扎根理论不同方法论视角之间的比较
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03303. doi: 10.1590/s1980-220x2017021803303. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
What can patients tell us about the quality and safety of hospital care? Findings from a UK multicentre survey study.患者能告诉我们关于医院护理质量和安全的什么信息?来自英国多中心调查研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):673-682. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006974. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.