• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常见测试地面表面对测力台数据的影响:对标准化的启示

The influence of common testing floor surfaces on force plate data: Implications for standardisation.

作者信息

Smith Laura, Jones Paul

机构信息

Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0319304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319304. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319304
PMID:40608747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12225842/
Abstract

Force plate testing is commonly used to assess athlete performance. However, there is limited research on the effect the surface underneath the force plate has on derived variables. The aim of this study was to investigate whether different surfaces underneath a force plate would elicit differences in derived force plate variables using a mechanical testing device. A device was used rather than human participants to ensure controlled and repeatable impacts. The device was used to assess force reduction, peak force, rate of force development (RFD) and contact time across seven common testing surfaces: vinyl, rubber, Olympic lifting platform, ground (CarpetG) and first floor (CarpetF) carpet, Mondo track and a sprung gymnasium floor (Sprung). Significant differences in force reduction, peak force, RFD, and contact time were found between flooring conditions (p < 0.05), with large to extremely large effect sizes. Sprung flooring exhibited the highest force reduction and lowest peak forces, while CarpetF demonstrated the lowest RFD and longest contact time. These findings highlight the flooring surface underneath the force plate during testing significantly influenced derived variables. Practitioners should exert caution and consideration to force plate testing location and advocate standardisation in flooring surface in order to ensure consistent and accurate results.

摘要

测力台测试常用于评估运动员的表现。然而,关于测力台下方表面对导出变量的影响的研究有限。本研究的目的是使用机械测试装置调查测力台下方不同表面是否会引起测力台导出变量的差异。使用了一种装置而非人类参与者,以确保冲击的可控性和可重复性。该装置用于评估七种常见测试表面的力衰减、峰值力、力发展速率(RFD)和接触时间:乙烯基、橡胶、奥林匹克举重平台、地面(CarpetG)和一楼(CarpetF)地毯、蒙多跑道和弹性体育馆地板(Sprung)。在不同地板条件下,力衰减、峰值力、RFD和接触时间存在显著差异(p < 0.05),效应大小为大到极大。弹性地板表现出最高的力衰减和最低的峰值力,而CarpetF的RFD最低,接触时间最长。这些发现突出表明,测试期间测力台下方的地板表面会显著影响导出变量。从业者在测力台测试位置方面应谨慎考虑,并提倡地板表面的标准化,以确保结果的一致性和准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/ed208029ae27/pone.0319304.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/2a7a99ddc857/pone.0319304.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/e5c006e3ea39/pone.0319304.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/faae76c844f0/pone.0319304.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/ed208029ae27/pone.0319304.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/2a7a99ddc857/pone.0319304.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/e5c006e3ea39/pone.0319304.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/faae76c844f0/pone.0319304.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c79/12225842/ed208029ae27/pone.0319304.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of common testing floor surfaces on force plate data: Implications for standardisation.常见测试地面表面对测力台数据的影响:对标准化的启示
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0319304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319304. eCollection 2025.
2
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
3
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of the Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Platform System Against a Piezoelectric Laboratory Grade System for Vertical Countermovement Jump Variables.Hawkin Dynamics 无线双力平台系统与压电实验室级系统在垂直反跳变量方面的有效性比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):1144-1148. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004785.
2
Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of VALD ForceDecks' strength, balance, and movement assessment tests.VALD ForceDecks力量、平衡和运动评估测试的同时效度和重测信度。
J Sci Med Sport. 2024 Aug;27(8):572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Force plate coverings significantly affect measurement of ground reaction forces.
力板覆盖物会显著影响地面反作用力的测量。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0293959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293959. eCollection 2023.
4
Countermovement Jump Force-Time Curve Analyses: Reliability and Comparability Across Force Plate Systems.反向运动跳跃力-时间曲线分析:不同测力台系统间的可靠性与可比性
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Jan 1;38(1):30-37. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004586. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
5
The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables.Hawkin Dynamics 无线双力板测量反跳和跳下变量的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 17;23(10):4820. doi: 10.3390/s23104820.
6
Analyzing Force-Time Curves: Comparison of Commercially Available Automated Software and Custom MATLAB Analyses.分析力-时曲线:商业可用自动软件与自定义 MATLAB 分析的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Sep 1;36(9):2387-2402. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004275. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
7
Concurrent Validity of a Portable Force Plate Using Vertical Jump Force-Time Characteristics.基于垂直跳跃力-时间特征的便携式测力台的同时效度
J Appl Biomech. 2018 Oct 1;34(5):410-413. doi: 10.1123/jab.2017-0371. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Influence of sports flooring and shoes on impact forces and performance during jump tasks.运动地板和鞋子对跳跃任务中冲击力及运动表现的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0186297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186297. eCollection 2017.
9
Alternative countermovement-jump analysis to quantify acute neuromuscular fatigue.替代反跳式跳跃分析量化急性神经肌肉疲劳。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Jan;10(1):84-92. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0413. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
A mechanical protocol to replicate impact in walking footwear.一种用于模拟步行鞋冲击的机械试验方案。
Gait Posture. 2014;40(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 2.