• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定用于促进居家老年康复的电子健康干预措施的利益相关者价值观:一种定性多方法途径

Identifying Stakeholder Values for an eHealth Intervention to Facilitate Home-Based Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Multi-Method Approach.

作者信息

Zonneveld Michael Bernardus Gustaaf, Pol Margriet Christine, Achterberg Wilco Pieter, Françoise van Dam van Isselt Eléonore

机构信息

Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251347139. doi: 10.1177/00469580251347139. Epub 2025 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1177/00469580251347139
PMID:40642813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254665/
Abstract

Despite the existing need for an integrated eHealth intervention for home-based geriatric rehabilitation, it has never, to our knowledge, been developed through co-creation with the stakeholders. This study aims to identify values (based on stakeholders' needs and preferences) regarding an eHealth intervention that fits the context of home-based geriatric rehabilitation. The multi-method qualitative design of this study comprised multiple qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews, and brainstorming sessions) and a survey. An agile science approach allowed for iterative data collection and analysis until an optimal fit was achieved. Recommendations from The Center of eHealth Research and Disease Management (CeHRes) Roadmap were used. Fourteen key stakeholders were identified, seven of which were represented in a project team that co-created the steps of this research. Based on the results of the qualitative methods, 15 eHealth attributes were formulated that captured the needs or preferences of the stakeholders. These resulted in the formulation of seven stakeholder values: (1) Fit with the patient's digital skills and needs, (2) Blended care, (3) Personalized, (4) Safety at home, (5) Affordability, (6) Support, and (7) Privacy. Co-creation with stakeholders is necessary for the development of eHealth interventions in home-based geriatric rehabilitation. The most prominent key stakeholder is the patient. eHealth should match with the digital skills of the patient and preferably be delivered as blended care. The formulated values should be incorporated in future development of eHealth interventions.

摘要

尽管目前需要一种用于居家老年康复的综合电子健康干预措施,但据我们所知,它从未通过与利益相关者共同创造而得以开发。本研究旨在确定与适合居家老年康复背景的电子健康干预措施相关的价值观(基于利益相关者的需求和偏好)。本研究的多方法定性设计包括多种定性方法(焦点小组、访谈和头脑风暴会议)以及一项调查。敏捷科学方法允许进行迭代数据收集和分析,直至实现最佳匹配。使用了电子健康研究与疾病管理中心(CeHRes)路线图的建议。确定了14个关键利益相关者,其中7个在共同制定本研究步骤的项目团队中得到了代表。基于定性方法的结果,制定了15个电子健康属性,这些属性体现了利益相关者的需求或偏好。由此得出了7个利益相关者价值观:(1)与患者数字技能和需求相匹配,(2)混合式护理,(3)个性化,(4)居家安全,(5)可承受性,(6)支持,以及(7)隐私。在居家老年康复的电子健康干预措施开发中,与利益相关者共同创造是必要的。最突出的关键利益相关者是患者。电子健康应与患者的数字技能相匹配,并且最好以混合式护理的形式提供。所制定的价值观应纳入电子健康干预措施的未来开发中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f41/12254665/42b63dd05a8b/10.1177_00469580251347139-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f41/12254665/42b63dd05a8b/10.1177_00469580251347139-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f41/12254665/42b63dd05a8b/10.1177_00469580251347139-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Stakeholder Values for an eHealth Intervention to Facilitate Home-Based Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Multi-Method Approach.确定用于促进居家老年康复的电子健康干预措施的利益相关者价值观:一种定性多方法途径
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251347139. doi: 10.1177/00469580251347139. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Adjustmentalisation - digitalisation as transformation process and the interplay between a digital logic and diverse primary care logics in Sweden.调整数字化——作为转型过程的数字化以及瑞典数字逻辑与多种初级保健逻辑之间的相互作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 25;39(5):744-763. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life.利益相关者对支持中风康复及回归日常生活的环境因素的看法。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70339. doi: 10.1111/hex.70339.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of guided telerehabilitation on functional performance in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review.远程康复指导对社区居住老年人功能表现的有效性:系统评价。
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Apr;38(4):457-477. doi: 10.1177/02692155231217411. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
An Exploratory Study Investigating Factors Influencing the Outpatient Delivery of Geriatric Rehabilitation.一项探索影响老年康复门诊服务提供因素的研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 31;12(15):5045. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155045.
3
Digital health for aging populations.人口老龄化的数字健康。
Nat Med. 2023 Jul;29(7):1623-1630. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02391-8. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
4
Perspectives of Rehabilitation Professionals on Implementing a Validated Home Telerehabilitation Intervention for Older Adults in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Multisite Focus Group Study.康复专业人员对在老年康复中为老年人实施经过验证的家庭远程康复干预措施的看法:多地点焦点小组研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul 18;10:e44498. doi: 10.2196/44498.
5
eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: An International Survey of the Experiences and Needs of Healthcare Professionals.老年康复中的电子健康:医疗保健专业人员经验与需求的国际调查
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 5;12(13):4504. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134504.
6
The quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the patients' perspective: a scoping review.从患者角度看老年康复的质量:范围综述。
Age Ageing. 2023 Mar 1;52(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad032.
7
A Qualitative Study Exploring Professional Perspectives of a Challenging Rehabilitation Environment for Geriatric Rehabilitation.一项探索老年康复挑战性康复环境专业观点的定性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 3;12(3):1231. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031231.
8
Effectiveness of outpatient geriatric rehabilitation after inpatient geriatric rehabilitation or hospitalisation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.门诊老年康复对住院老年康复或住院治疗后的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jan 8;52(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac300.
9
Digital Engagement of Older Adults: Scoping Review.老年人的数字化参与:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 7;24(12):e40192. doi: 10.2196/40192.
10
Bridging Connectivity Issues in Digital Access and Literacy: Reflections on Empowering Vulnerable Older Adults in Singapore.弥合数字接入与素养方面的连接问题:关于增强新加坡弱势老年人能力的思考
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 3;5(2):e34764. doi: 10.2196/34764.