Suppr超能文献

不同提取方法所得多糖的比较

Comparison of Polysaccharides from Different Extraction Methods.

作者信息

Chen Yan, Du Hanchen, Qu Wenjie, Sun Chaoqun, Chen Qu, Du Yuping, Zhang Zhuoyuan, Guo Yiran, Wang Chonglin, Huang Jian, Yin Jiyong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):2188. doi: 10.3390/foods14132188.

Abstract

Although our previous research has indicated that the ultrasound-assisted extraction-deep eutectic solvent method possessed the highest extraction yield for Polysaccharide, it is uncertain whether the Polysaccharide that was extracted by the ultrasound-assisted extraction-deep eutectic solvent method possesses the same performance as that extracted by other methods and whether separation and purification affect the performance of Polysaccharide. This paper aimed to compare the differences in performance among the Polysaccharides extracted using different methods, including the ultrasound-assisted extraction-deep eutectic solvent method, which was the first method used by our team to extract Polysaccharide. This paper also aimed to compare the differences in Polysaccharides before and after they were separated and purified. The extraction yield, structural composition, and antioxidant activity of Polysaccharides were compared, respectively. The extraction yield (45.08%) obtained by the ultrasound-assisted extraction-deep eutectic solvent method was the highest ( < 0.05), the structural compositions of Polysaccharides extracted using different methods were similar, and the separated and purified Polysaccharide was a neutral polysaccharide. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl and 2,20-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfoniacid) levels in the Polysaccharide extracted by the ultrasound-assisted extraction-deep eutectic solvent method were significantly higher than those obtained using other methods ( < 0.05), and the antioxidant activity of the Polysaccharide extracted by this method was significantly higher after it was separated and purified ( < 0.05). This study not only proved that the ultrasound-assisted extraction-deep eutectic solvent method could increase the extraction yield and keep the structural composition and antioxidant activity of Polysaccharide at the maximum levels but also confirmed that the extracted Polysaccharide should not be further separated and purified, providing a potential technique to extract Polysaccharide. This study will further promote the application of Polysaccharides in the health product industry.

摘要

尽管我们之前的研究表明,超声辅助提取-深共熔溶剂法对多糖的提取率最高,但通过该方法提取的多糖是否具有与其他方法提取的多糖相同的性能,以及分离纯化是否会影响多糖的性能尚不确定。本文旨在比较不同方法提取的多糖之间的性能差异,其中包括超声辅助提取-深共熔溶剂法,这是我们团队首次用于提取多糖的方法。本文还旨在比较多糖分离纯化前后的差异。分别比较了多糖的提取率、结构组成和抗氧化活性。超声辅助提取-深共熔溶剂法获得的提取率(45.08%)最高(<0.05),不同方法提取的多糖结构组成相似,且分离纯化后的多糖为中性多糖。超声辅助提取-深共熔溶剂法提取的多糖中2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼和2,2'-联氮-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)水平显著高于其他方法获得的水平(<0.05),且该方法提取的多糖分离纯化后的抗氧化活性显著提高(<0.05)。本研究不仅证明了超声辅助提取-深共熔溶剂法可以提高提取率,并使多糖的结构组成和抗氧化活性保持在最高水平,还证实了提取的多糖不应进一步分离纯化,为多糖提取提供了一种潜在技术。本研究将进一步促进多糖在保健品行业的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccf8/12249235/f4cf44dc50dc/foods-14-02188-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验