• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性出生队列研究中孕妇的招募和保留:文献的范围审查和内容分析。

Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 1100 Delaplaine Ct, Madison, WI 53715, United States of America.

College of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education (SURE) Center, United States of America; Department of Family and Community Medicine, United States of America; Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 09 5360, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States of America.

出版信息

Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2021 May-Jun;85:106974. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106974. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106974
PMID:33766723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8137666/
Abstract

Longitudinal cohort studies present unique methodological challenges, especially when they focus on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the existing knowledge on recruitment and retention (RR) of pregnant women in birth cohort studies and to make recommendations for researchers to improve research engagement of this population. A scoping review and content analysis were conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to the RR of pregnant women in cohort studies. The search retrieved 574 articles, with 38 meeting eligibility criteria and focused on RR among English-speaking, adult women, who are pregnant or in early postpartum period, enrolled in birth cohort studies. Selected studies were birth cohort (including longitudinal) (n = 20), feasibility (n = 14), and other (n = 4) non-interventional study designs. The majority were from low-risk populations. Abstracted data were coded according to emergent theme clusters. The majority of abstracted data (79%) focused on recruitment practices, with only 21% addressing retention strategies. Overall, facilitators were reported more often (75%) than barriers (25%). Building trusting relationships and employing diverse recruitment methods emerged as major recruitment facilitators; major barriers included heterogeneous participant reasons for refusal and cultural factors. Key retention facilitators included flexibility with scheduling, frequent communication, and culturally sensitive practices, whereas participant factors such as loss of interest, pregnancy loss, relocation, multiple caregiver shifts, and substance use/psychiatric problems were cited as major barriers. Better understanding of facilitators and barriers of RR can help enhance the internal and external validity of future birth/pre-birth cohorts. Strategies presented in this review can help inform investigators and funding agencies of best practices for RR of pregnant women in longitudinal studies.

摘要

纵向队列研究提出了独特的方法学挑战,尤其是当它们关注孕妇等弱势群体时。本综述的目的是综合现有的关于招募和保留(RR)孕妇的知识,并为研究人员提出建议,以提高该人群的研究参与度。采用范围综述和内容分析来确定队列研究中 RR 孕妇的促进因素和障碍。检索到 574 篇文章,其中 38 篇符合入选标准,主要关注英语为母语的成年孕妇在队列研究中的 RR,她们处于怀孕或产后早期,参与了出生队列研究。入选的研究包括出生队列(包括纵向)研究(n=20)、可行性研究(n=14)和其他(n=4)非干预性研究设计。大多数研究来自低风险人群。根据新兴主题群集对提取的数据进行编码。提取数据的大部分(79%)侧重于招募实践,只有 21%涉及保留策略。总体而言,促进因素的报告频率(75%)高于障碍(25%)。建立信任关系和采用多样化的招募方法被认为是主要的招募促进因素;主要障碍包括参与者拒绝的原因和文化因素的多样性。主要的保留促进因素包括灵活的日程安排、频繁的沟通和文化敏感的做法,而参与者的因素,如失去兴趣、妊娠丢失、搬迁、多个照顾者轮班和物质使用/精神问题,被认为是主要的障碍。更好地了解 RR 的促进因素和障碍可以帮助提高未来出生/产前队列的内部和外部有效性。本综述中提出的策略可以帮助告知研究人员和资助机构在纵向研究中招募孕妇的最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature.前瞻性出生队列研究中孕妇的招募和保留:文献的范围审查和内容分析。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2021 May-Jun;85:106974. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106974. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.为改善孕产妇和新生儿结局而激励女性增加产前检查的使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;2015(12):CD009916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2.
3
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women.用于治疗符合抗逆转录病毒治疗条件的孕妇艾滋病毒感染的抗逆转录病毒疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008440.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Metformin for women who are overweight or obese during pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes.孕期超重或肥胖女性使用二甲双胍以改善母婴结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD010564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010564.pub2.
6
Methods for blood loss estimation after vaginal birth.阴道分娩后失血估计方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD010980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010980.pub2.
7
Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy.孕期外用糖皮质激素的安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 26;2015(10):CD007346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007346.pub3.
8
Cell salvage for the management of postpartum haemorrhage.采用细胞回收技术管理产后出血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD016120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016120.
9
Oral anti-diabetic agents for women with established diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance or previous gestational diabetes planning pregnancy, or pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes.用于患有已确诊糖尿病/糖耐量受损或既往妊娠糖尿病且计划怀孕的女性,或患有孕前糖尿病的孕妇的口服抗糖尿病药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):CD007724. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007724.pub3.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Recruitment of Low-Income Pregnant Persons in Interdisciplinary Research to Understand the Impact of Social and Environmental Determinants: Lessons Learned About Implementation and Recruitment.招募低收入孕妇参与跨学科研究以了解社会和环境决定因素影响的重要性:关于实施与招募的经验教训
Health Equity. 2025 Mar 21;9(1):175-182. doi: 10.1089/heq.2024.0112. eCollection 2025.
2
Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a birth cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study.在新冠疫情期间开展出生队列研究的可行性与可接受性:一项混合方法研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07850-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural Competence or Cultural Humility? Moving Beyond the Debate.文化能力还是文化谦逊?超越争论
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):142-145. doi: 10.1177/1524839919884912. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
2
Google AdWords and Facebook Ads for Recruitment of Pregnant Women into a Prospective Cohort Study With Long-Term Follow-Up.谷歌关键词广告和脸书广告在招募长期随访前瞻性队列研究孕妇中的应用。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1285-1291. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02797-2.
3
Factors associated with recruitment, surveillance participation, and retention in an observational study of pregnant women and influenza.
Perception of Risks of Cannabis and Cannabidiol Use during Pregnancy: A Multi-Methods Study.
孕期使用大麻和大麻二酚的风险认知:一项多方法研究
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2025 Jun 11;8(1):130-143. doi: 10.1159/000546312. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Child-Centrism as an Adaptive Parenting Style: A Prospective Study in Motherhood from Women's Life Satisfaction Including Cognitive-Emotional Resources.以儿童为中心作为一种适应性养育方式:一项从女性生活满意度(包括认知情感资源)出发对母亲身份进行的前瞻性研究。
Children (Basel). 2025 May 5;12(5):601. doi: 10.3390/children12050601.
5
Why do patients take part in research? An updated overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators.患者为何参与研究?心理社会障碍与促进因素的系统评价最新综述。
Trials. 2025 May 27;26(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08850-6.
6
Barriers and strategies for recruitment of pregnant women in contemporary longitudinal birth cohort studies.当代纵向出生队列研究中招募孕妇的障碍与策略
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02570-w.
7
Engaging, recruiting, and retaining pregnant people from marginalized communities in environmental health cohort studies: a scoping review.在环境卫生队列研究中吸引、招募和留住来自边缘化社区的孕妇:一项范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22033-7.
8
Establishing a model of peer support for pregnant persons with a substance use disorder as an innovative approach for engaging participants in the healthy brain and child development study.建立针对患有物质使用障碍的孕妇的同伴支持模型,作为让参与者参与健康大脑与儿童发育研究的一种创新方法。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jan;71:101495. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101495. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
9
Recruitment and retention strategies to promote research engagement among caregivers and their children: A scoping review.促进照顾者及其子女参与研究的招募和保留策略:一项范围综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 8;8(1):e194. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.624. eCollection 2024.
10
Participant engagement and involvement in longitudinal cohort studies: qualitative insights from a selection of pregnancy and birth, twin, and family-based population cohort studies.参与者对纵向队列研究的参与度:来自一系列妊娠与分娩、双胞胎及基于家庭的人群队列研究的定性见解
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02419-8.
与观察性研究中招募、监测参与和保留孕妇和流感相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 8;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2280-0.
4
Does attrition affect estimates of association: A longitudinal study.损耗是否会影响关联的估计:一项纵向研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;110:127-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.12.022. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
The interaction of personal, contextual, and study characteristics and their effect on recruitment and participation of pregnant women in research: a qualitative study in Lebanon.个人、背景和研究特征的相互作用及其对黎巴嫩孕妇参与研究的招募和参与的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0616-5.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women's participation in research: A systematic review.促进和阻碍孕妇参与研究的因素:系统评价。
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):350-361. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research.孕妇在临床研究中的脆弱性。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):657-663. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103955. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
The Raine study had no evidence of significant perinatal selection bias after two decades of follow up: a longitudinal pregnancy cohort study.经过二十年的随访,莱恩研究没有发现围产期存在显著选择偏倚的证据:一项纵向妊娠队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1391-8.
10
The Born in Guangzhou Cohort Study (BIGCS).广州出生队列研究(BIGCS)。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;32(4):337-346. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0239-x. Epub 2017 Mar 20.