Harris E N, Gharavi A E, Tincani A, Chan J K, Englert H, Mantelli P, Allegro F, Ballestrieri G, Hughes G R
J Clin Lab Immunol. 1985 Aug;17(4):155-62.
Recent studies have raised questions concerning the specificity of anticardiolipin antibodies and their relationship to anti-DNA antibodies, the lupus anticoagulant, the biological false positive test for syphilis, and reagin, the antibody detected in syphilis. In an attempt to answer some of these questions, 3 IgG and 2 IgM affinity purified anticardiolipin antibodies, as well as 3 affinity purified anti-DNA antibodies were studied. Affinity purified anti-cardiolipin antibodies showed high binding to negatively charged phospholipids but not to ssDNA by solid phase radioimmunoassay. On the other hand, affinity purified anti-DNA antibodies did not bind cardiolipin. Inhibition experiments showed that negatively charged phospholipids and VDRL liposomes inhibited the binding of anticardiolipin antibodies to phosphatidylserine, but ssDNA, alpha-glycerol phosphate and hyaluronic acid did not. Similar studies of sera from patients with high anticardiolipin antibody levels supported the results obtained with affinity purified anticardiolipin antibodies. These results suggest that anticardiolipin antibodies bind negatively charged phospholipids and there appears to be little crossreactivity with DNA or unrelated negatively charged polymers such as hyaluronic acid. Both the negatively charged phosphodiester group and glyceride portions of the phospholipid molecules appear important for their antigenicity. Four of the 5 affinity purified anti-cardiolipin antibodies had lupus anticoagulant activity providing further evidence to suggest that these 2 groups of antibodies have the same or very similar specificities. Studies of sera from 3 patients with syphilis showed that VDRL liposomes inhibited reagin activity to a greater extent than did cardiolipin. On the other hand, in patients with autoimmune disorders, cardiolipin inhibited anticardiolipin antibody activity to a greater extent than did VDRL liposomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
最近的研究对抗心磷脂抗体的特异性及其与抗DNA抗体、狼疮抗凝物、梅毒生物学假阳性试验以及梅毒中检测到的抗体反应素之间的关系提出了疑问。为了回答其中一些问题,研究了3种IgG和2种IgM亲和纯化的抗心磷脂抗体,以及3种亲和纯化的抗DNA抗体。通过固相放射免疫测定,亲和纯化的抗心磷脂抗体显示出与带负电荷的磷脂有高结合力,但与单链DNA无结合。另一方面,亲和纯化的抗DNA抗体不与心磷脂结合。抑制实验表明,带负电荷的磷脂和VDRL脂质体抑制抗心磷脂抗体与磷脂酰丝氨酸的结合,但单链DNA、α-甘油磷酸和透明质酸则无此作用。对高抗心磷脂抗体水平患者血清的类似研究支持了用亲和纯化的抗心磷脂抗体获得的结果。这些结果表明,抗心磷脂抗体与带负电荷的磷脂结合,与DNA或无关的带负电荷聚合物如透明质酸几乎没有交叉反应。磷脂分子带负电荷的磷酸二酯基团和甘油酯部分对其抗原性似乎都很重要。5种亲和纯化的抗心磷脂抗体中有4种具有狼疮抗凝活性,这进一步证明这两组抗体具有相同或非常相似的特异性。对3例梅毒患者血清的研究表明,VDRL脂质体比心磷脂更能抑制反应素活性。另一方面,在自身免疫性疾病患者中,心磷脂比VDRL脂质体更能抑制抗心磷脂抗体活性。(摘要截短于250字)