McCredie M, Brooks P M
Med J Aust. 1985 Nov 25;143(11):492-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1985.tb119909.x.
In 1981, questionnaires seeking information about the teaching of medicine in general, and rheumatology in particular, were sent to random samples of undergraduates in Australian medical schools and trainees in the Family Medicine Programme (FMP) of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Neurology rated most highly, with the majority of undergraduates considering it to be well taught and interesting; by contrast, rheumatology was perceived as being badly taught and lacking in interest. Many graduates had never attended rheumatology outpatient clinics either as undergraduates (45%) or as FMP trainees (68%). Only 40% of the graduates had ever been attached to a rheumatology inpatient service, and fewer than 50% had received any teaching about the role of physiotherapists or occupational therapists in the management of patients with arthritis.
1981年,针对澳大利亚医学院校的本科生以及澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院家庭医学项目(FMP)的学员,随机抽取样本发放问卷,以获取有关医学教学尤其是风湿病教学的信息。神经病学的评价最高,大多数本科生认为其教学良好且有趣;相比之下,风湿病学被认为教学糟糕且缺乏吸引力。许多毕业生无论是在本科阶段(45%)还是在FMP培训阶段(68%)都从未去过风湿病门诊。只有40%的毕业生曾参与过风湿病住院服务,并且不到50%的毕业生接受过任何关于物理治疗师或职业治疗师在关节炎患者管理中作用的教学。