If it wasn't for us, there would be no data: stakeholders' perspectives on patient involvement in the use of health data in Ireland.
作者信息
Bedenik Tina, Geaney Fiona, Foley Barbara, Flynn Rachel, Bennett Kathleen E
机构信息
Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
FutureNeuro Research Ireland Centre for Translational Brain Science, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
出版信息
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 28;11(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00761-9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
If it wasn't for us, there would be no data: stakeholders' perspectives on patient involvement in the use of health data in Ireland.如果没有我们，就不会有数据：利益相关者对爱尔兰患者参与健康数据使用的看法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 28;11(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00761-9.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗：一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验：对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果：面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
7
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比，自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法：一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
本文引用的文献
1
I don't mind my information going to the Moon, but I don't want any letters from Mars: a qualitative exploration of the challenges with secondary use of health data in Ireland.我不介意我的信息被送往月球，但我不想收到来自火星的任何信件：对爱尔兰健康数据二次使用挑战的定性探索。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 24;83(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01524-4.
2
Building public trust and confidence in secondary use of health data for healthcare improvement and research: a qualitative study pre-protocol.建立公众对二次利用健康数据以改善医疗保健和开展研究的信任和信心：一项定性研究的预方案
HRB Open Res. 2024 Jun 17;6:47. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13711.2. eCollection 2023.
3
Health data sharing attitudes towards primary and secondary use of data: a systematic review.对健康数据初次使用和二次使用的共享态度：一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 18;71:102551. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102551. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.患者和公众对个人健康数据用于第三方或二次使用的意愿：系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e50421. doi: 10.2196/50421.
5
Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.有意义的患者和公众参与数字健康创新、实施和评估：系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1232-1245. doi: 10.1111/hex.13506. Epub 2022 May 8.
6
General data protection regulations (2018) and clinical research: perspectives of patients and doctors in an Irish university teaching hospital.一般数据保护条例（2018）与临床研究：爱尔兰一所大学教学医院中患者和医生的观点。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;191(4):1513-1519. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02789-8. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.关于对卫生行政和临床试验数据二次使用与共享态度的系统文献综述：以同意为重点。
Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;10(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01663-z.
8
A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency.健康消费者对健康管理和临床试验数据二次使用和共享的态度的系统文献综述：重点关注隐私、信任和透明度。
Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 9;9(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01481-9.
9
Insurance Customers' Expectations for Sharing Health Data: Qualitative Survey Study.保险客户对共享健康数据的期望：定性调查研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 26;8(3):e16102. doi: 10.2196/16102.
10
Share and protect our health data: an evidence based approach to rare disease patients' perspectives on data sharing and data protection - quantitative survey and recommendations.分享和保护我们的健康数据：基于证据的罕见病患者对数据共享和数据保护观点 - 定量调查和建议。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jul 12;14(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1123-4.
Zotero 插件