Suppr超能文献

与情绪障碍相关的风险因素、保护因素、外周生物标志物和神经认知标志物:对103项荟萃分析和系统评价的综合综述

Risk factors, protective factors, peripheral biomarkers, and neurocognitive markers associated with mood disorders: An umbrella review of 103 meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

作者信息

Wang Huixue, Ma Lijun, Zhang Mi, Zu Zhenyue, Wei Wenzhuo, Li Ni, Yang Linxi, Chen Fenglan, Fan Chuan, Wang Kai, Li Xiaoming

机构信息

School of Mental Health and Psychological Science, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China.

出版信息

Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025 Jul 19;48:101068. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101068. eCollection 2025 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mood disorders, including bipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), are extensively studied regarding environmental risk factors, protective factors, peripheral biomarkers, and cognitive neurocognitive markers. Our umbrella review of observational studies aims to separately elucidate these associations with BD and MDD.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was conducted, with a search end date of October 17, 2024. We included systematic reviews that provided meta-analyses of observational studies that examined associations of potential environmental risk factors, environmental protective factors, peripheral biomarkers and neurocognitive markers with mood disorder. We synthesized data using summary effect estimates (e.g., odds ratio [OR], relative risk [RR]), evaluated quality with AMSTAR 2. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023439581).

RESULTS

Identified 103 articles from 2782 initially screened. In depression, we identified 95 risk factors, 18 protective factors, 19 biomarkers, and 10 neurocognitive markers. For MDD, evidence of association was convincing (class I) history of mental illness (OR 6.77, 95 %CI 5.07-9.04), perinatal domestic violence exposure (OR 3.14, 95 %CI 2.74-3.61), and Mediterranean diet adherence (OR 0.87, 95 %CI 0.84-0.91). For BD, evidence of association was suggestive (class Ⅲ) for cannabis use (OR 2.97, 95 %CI 1.80-4.90), obesity (OR 1.77, 95 %CI 1.40-2.23) were prominent risk factors. The evidence levels of biomarkers and cognitive neuro-markers for BD and MDD are at suggestive (class Ⅲ) or below.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the complexity of the interrelationship between mood disorders and numerous risk and protective factors. However, the reviewed associations are not necessarily causal. Future research should prioritize prospective high-quality studies to establish causality and thus facilitate the development of targeted interventions and preventive measures for mood disorders.

摘要

背景

情绪障碍,包括双相情感障碍(BD)和重度抑郁症(MDD),在环境风险因素、保护因素、外周生物标志物和认知神经认知标志物方面得到了广泛研究。我们对观察性研究的伞状综述旨在分别阐明这些与BD和MDD的关联。

方法

对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane进行了全面检索,检索截止日期为2024年10月17日。我们纳入了系统综述,这些综述提供了对观察性研究的荟萃分析,这些研究考察了潜在环境风险因素、环境保护因素、外周生物标志物和神经认知标志物与情绪障碍的关联。我们使用汇总效应估计值(如比值比[OR]、相对风险[RR])合成数据,用AMSTAR 2评估质量。本综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42023439581)注册。

结果

从最初筛选的2782篇文章中识别出103篇。在抑郁症方面,我们识别出95个风险因素、18个保护因素、19个生物标志物和10个神经认知标志物。对于MDD,关联证据令人信服(I类)的有精神疾病史(OR 6.77,95%CI 5.07 - 9.04)、围产期家庭暴力暴露(OR 3.14,95%CI 2.74 - 3.61)以及坚持地中海饮食(OR 0.87,95%CI 0.84 - 0.91)。对于BD,关联证据具有提示性(Ⅲ类)的有使用大麻(OR 2.97,95%CI 1.80 - 4.90)、肥胖(OR 1.77,95%CI 1.40 - 2.23),这些是突出的风险因素。BD和MDD的生物标志物和认知神经标志物的证据水平处于提示性(Ⅲ类)或以下。

结论

本综述强调了情绪障碍与众多风险和保护因素之间相互关系的复杂性。然而,所综述的关联不一定是因果关系。未来的研究应优先进行前瞻性高质量研究以确定因果关系,从而促进针对情绪障碍的靶向干预和预防措施的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a14/12309926/ce20b31f0f3c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验