• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德尔菲专家小组数据的实时分析,以促进会议中的迭代评分。

Real-time analysis of Delphi panel data to facilitate iterative rating within meetings.

作者信息

Weinstein Julien B, Hogan Cainnear K, Whittington Taylor, Cano Jennifer, Seelye Sarah M, Sussman Jeremy B, Bernstein Steven J, Prescott Hallie C

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 31;18(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07409-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-025-07409-7
PMID:40745618
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Modified Delphi panel process involves iterative ratings, often with lengthy lags between rounds to allow time for data analysis. We sought to develop, implement, and evaluate an approach for real-time data analysis and presentation to complete multiple rounds of ratings in a single panel meeting.

RESULTS

We developed statistical code in Python to analyze Delphi panel ratings completed in Slido using a 9-point Likert scale. The code generates histograms of panel ratings. The median score is color-coded pink when formal disagreement criteria are met (regardless of median score), and when there is no disagreement, red for median scores of 1-3, yellow for 4-6, and green for 7-9. We implemented this approach for a Delphi panel on sepsis recovery that rated three sets of care practices. Round 1 rating, panel discussion, and round 2 rating all occurred in one day for each set of practices. Round 1 ratings were presented during discussion. This approach avoided "homework" outside meetings. All panelists either strongly agreed (57%) or agreed (43%) it was easy to understand the presentation of round 1 ratings. Most panelists either strongly agreed (50%) or agreed (21%) that they liked doing both rounds of rating during the meetings.

摘要

目的

改良德尔菲专家小组流程涉及反复评分,各轮之间通常有较长间隔时间以便进行数据分析。我们试图开发、实施并评估一种实时数据分析和展示方法,以便在一次专家小组会议中完成多轮评分。

结果

我们用Python编写了统计代码,以分析在Slido上使用9点李克特量表完成的德尔菲专家小组评分。该代码生成专家小组评分的直方图。当满足正式的分歧标准时(无论中位数分数如何),中位数分数用粉色编码;当不存在分歧时,1 - 3分的中位数分数用红色编码,4 - 6分用黄色编码,7 - 9分用绿色编码。我们将这种方法应用于一个关于脓毒症康复的德尔菲专家小组,该小组对三组护理措施进行了评分。对于每组措施,第一轮评分、小组讨论和第二轮评分均在一天内完成。第一轮评分在讨论期间展示。这种方法避免了会议之外的“作业”。所有小组成员要么强烈同意(57%),要么同意(43%)第一轮评分的展示很容易理解。大多数小组成员要么强烈同意(50%),要么同意(21%)他们喜欢在会议期间完成两轮评分。

相似文献

1
Real-time analysis of Delphi panel data to facilitate iterative rating within meetings.德尔菲专家小组数据的实时分析,以促进会议中的迭代评分。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 31;18(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07409-7.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Developing Balanced Quality Indicators for Monitoring Virtual Care in Ambulatory Care Environments: Modified Delphi Panel Process.制定用于监测门诊护理环境中虚拟护理的平衡质量指标:改良德尔菲专家小组法
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e38657. doi: 10.2196/38657.
4
Prioritizing attributes of approaches to analyzing patient-centered outcomes that are truncated due to death in critical care clinical trials: a Delphi study.对重症监护临床试验中因死亡而被截断的以患者为中心结局分析方法的属性进行优先级排序:一项德尔菲研究。
Trials. 2025 Jan 10;26(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08673-x.
5
Global Delphi consensus on treatment goals for generalized pustular psoriasis.关于泛发性脓疱型银屑病治疗目标的全球德尔菲共识。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):706-716. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae491.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
Development of the CHILD-SHOE Reporting Checklist: A Scoping Review and Modified Delphi Study to Support Reporting in Children's Footwear Research.儿童鞋类报告清单的制定:一项范围综述和改良德尔菲研究,以支持儿童鞋类研究中的报告
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70065. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70065.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
10
Seeking clinical consensus on risk assessment in anatomical infravesical obstruction of boys - A Delphi study.寻求关于男孩膀胱下梗阻风险评估的临床共识——一项德尔菲研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1142-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Delphi technique: myths and realities.德尔菲技术:神话与现实。
J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(4):376-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x.
2
Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.共识方法:特点及使用指南
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979.