Suppr超能文献

多机构在室温下对扩散加权成像体模进行纵向表观扩散系数测量。

Multi-institution longitudinal apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in a diffusion weighted imaging phantom at room temperature.

作者信息

Moore Chris, Bull Charlotte, Darekar Angela, Wilson Daniel, Goodall Alex, Manoharan Prakash, Hoskin Peter, van Herk Marcel, Buckley David L, McHugh Damien J, Datta Anubhav, Dubec Michael J

机构信息

Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 22;35:100814. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100814. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This work contributes to technical validation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a biomarker of cancer. The aim was to evaluate ADC accuracy, random error, short-term and long-term repeatability and reproducibility, across multiple institutions using a room temperature phantom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ADC measurements were made in a travelling room temperature diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) phantom on six scanners at four UK institutions over 18 months at six-month intervals. ADC bias measurements were calculated as the difference between measured and temperature corrected ground-truth ADC values and used to calculate mean ADC bias, isocentre ADC error estimate, short- and long-term intra-scanner repeatability as per the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) DWI profiles, and inter-scanner reproducibility by calculating the 95 % limits of agreement for all ADC bias measurements.

RESULTS

The use of a room-temperature phantom with a magnetic resonance (MR) readable thermometer enabled ADC measurements without ice-water setup, considerably simplifying logistics with respect to multi-institution ADC quality assurance. Mean ADC bias across all scanners and sessions was <0.01 × 10 mm s (0.81 %); mean isocentre ADC error estimate was 1.43 %; average scanner short-term repeatability was <0.01 × 10 mm s (1 %). Reproducibility was 0.07 × 10 mm s (9 %).

CONCLUSION

Results indicated good ADC accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility; demonstrating the feasibility of transferring diagnostic DWI sequences between scanners from the same manufacturer, for use in multi-institution longitudinal studies, and assessing ADC with minimal quality control and harmonisation steps required.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究有助于对表观扩散系数(ADC)作为癌症生物标志物进行技术验证。目的是使用室温体模,在多个机构评估ADC的准确性、随机误差、短期和长期重复性及再现性。

材料与方法

在18个月内,每隔6个月在英国4家机构的6台扫描仪上,对一个移动的室温扩散加权成像(DWI)体模进行ADC测量。ADC偏差测量值计算为测量的ADC值与经温度校正的真实ADC值之间的差值,并用于计算平均ADC偏差、等中心ADC误差估计值、按照定量成像生物标志物联盟(QIBA)DWI曲线的扫描仪内短期和长期重复性,以及通过计算所有ADC偏差测量值的95%一致性界限来评估扫描仪间再现性。

结果

使用带有磁共振(MR)可读温度计的室温体模,无需冰水设置即可进行ADC测量,大大简化了多机构ADC质量保证的后勤工作。所有扫描仪和测量环节的平均ADC偏差<0.01×10⁻³mm²/s(0.81%);平均等中心ADC误差估计值为1.43%;扫描仪平均短期重复性<0.01×10⁻³mm²/s(1%)。再现性为0.07×10⁻³mm²/s(9%)。

结论

结果表明ADC具有良好的准确性、重复性和再现性;证明了在同一制造商的扫描仪之间转移诊断性DWI序列用于多机构纵向研究的可行性,以及在所需质量控制和协调步骤最少的情况下评估ADC的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d11/12314170/de0cc530eef4/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验