Abdulwehab Sadik, Kedir Frezer
School of Nursing, Wollega University, Oromia, Ethiopia.
School of Nursing, Jimma University, Southwest Oromia, Ethiopia.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 4;20(8):e0328222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328222. eCollection 2025.
Palliative care is a crucial component of end-stage disease management, but its utilization remains low in low- and middle-income countries, such as Ethiopia. This is due to various systemic, social, and policy barriers. Understanding these contextual factors is crucial for developing effective interventions and policy frameworks. This study aimed to explore and synthesize the barriers and facilitators to palliative care service utilization in Ethiopia using a qualitative systematic review approach.
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Qualitative Synthesis (PRISMA-Q) guidelines, employing a qualitative systematic design. A comprehensive search was conducted across various databases using tailored keywords and MeSH terms up. The database was searched for every article published on palliative care services up to March 10, 2025, and was updated continuously until it was sent for publication. The data was extracted from March 11-20 and later analyzed from March 21-30, and the report generation till April 10, 2025. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze findings and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research approach was employed to assess the confidence of evidence.
Six studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse Ethiopian healthcare settings and stakeholders. Five major barriers were identified: policy and governance gaps, health system challenges, knowledge and training deficits, sociocultural and economic constraints, and poor collaboration. In contrast, five facilitators emerged: strong community and family support, intrinsic healthcare provider motivation, integration of palliative care into education, holistic care models, and stakeholder engagement. High confidence was assigned to four themes, underscoring their significance and applicability.
The underutilization of palliative care in Ethiopia stems from intertwined structural, educational, and sociocultural challenges. However, promising facilitators exist that can guide policy reform and intervention design. Addressing these barriers through improved policies, workforce development, and community engagement is imperative for ensuring equitable access to quality palliative care services.
姑息治疗是终末期疾病管理的关键组成部分,但在埃塞俄比亚等低收入和中等收入国家,其利用率仍然很低。这是由于各种系统、社会和政策障碍所致。了解这些背景因素对于制定有效的干预措施和政策框架至关重要。本研究旨在采用定性系统评价方法,探索并综合埃塞俄比亚姑息治疗服务利用的障碍和促进因素。
本评价遵循系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南以及定性综合的系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-Q)指南,采用定性系统设计。使用定制的关键词和医学主题词在各种数据库中进行全面检索。检索数据库中截至2025年3月10日发表的关于姑息治疗服务的每篇文章,并持续更新直至送交发表。数据于3月11日至20日提取,并于3月21日至30日进行分析,报告生成直至2025年4月10日。采用主题综合法分析研究结果,并采用定性研究综述证据的推荐评估、发展和评价分级方法评估证据的可信度。
六项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖埃塞俄比亚不同的医疗保健环境和利益相关者。确定了五个主要障碍:政策和治理差距、卫生系统挑战、知识和培训不足、社会文化和经济限制以及合作不佳。相比之下,出现了五个促进因素:强大的社区和家庭支持、医疗保健提供者的内在动力、将姑息治疗纳入教育、整体护理模式以及利益相关者参与。对四个主题给予高可信度,突出了它们的重要性和适用性。
埃塞俄比亚姑息治疗利用不足源于相互交织的结构、教育和社会文化挑战。然而,存在一些有前景的促进因素,可指导政策改革和干预设计。通过改进政策、劳动力发展和社区参与来解决这些障碍,对于确保公平获得优质姑息治疗服务至关重要。