Seidel Philipp, Kaufmann Tobias, Wolfers Thomas
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Tübingen, Germany.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 28:2025.07.11.664301. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.664301.
Normative models have gained popularity in computational psychiatry for studying individual-level differences relative to population norms in biological data such as brain imaging, where measures like cortical thickness are typically predicted from variables such as age and sex. Nearly all published models to date are based on cross-sectional data, limiting their ability to predict longitudinal change. Here, we used longitudinal brain data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, comprising cortical thickness measures from 180 regions per hemisphere in youths at baseline (N=6179; 47% females), 2-year (N=6179; 47% females), and 4-year (N=805; 45% females) follow-up. A training set was established from baseline and 2-year follow-up data (N=5374; 47% females), while data from individuals with all three time points available served as an independent test set (N=805; 45% females). We developed sex-specific Baseline-Integrated Norms (B-Norms) that predict brain region thickness at follow-up based on baseline thickness, baseline age, and follow-up age, and compared them to sex-specific standard Cross-Sectional Norms (C-Norms) based on age alone. Out-of-sample testing in 2-year and 4-year follow-up data showed that B-Norms consistently provided better fits than C-Norms for nearly all cortical regions. Explained variance was higher in B-Norms than in C-Norms. We found no significant differences between time points (p = 0.45). Repeated measures ANOVA revealed differences in higher-order moments (e.g., skewness and kurtosis) for both models; for example, skewness varied by model, sex, time point, and their interactions. While improved fit alone does not necessarily indicate a superior normative model - since normative models aim to capture population variance rather than simply optimize fit - we demonstrated that four regions were associated with pubertal changes in B-Norms but not in C-Norms, suggesting enhanced sensitivity of B-Norms to developmental processes. Together, our findings highlight the potential of B-Norms for capturing normative variation in longitudinal structural brain change.
规范模型在计算精神病学中越来越受欢迎,用于研究相对于大脑成像等生物数据中的总体规范的个体差异,在大脑成像中,诸如皮质厚度等测量通常是根据年龄和性别等变量来预测的。几乎所有迄今为止发表的模型都是基于横断面数据,这限制了它们预测纵向变化的能力。在这里,我们使用了青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究中的纵向大脑数据,包括基线时(N = 6179;47%为女性)、2年随访时(N = 6179;47%为女性)和4年随访时(N = 805;45%为女性)每个半球180个区域的皮质厚度测量值。一个训练集是根据基线和2年随访数据建立的(N = 5374;47%为女性),而拥有所有三个时间点数据的个体的数据用作独立测试集(N = 805;45%为女性)。我们开发了特定性别的基线综合规范(B规范),该规范根据基线厚度、基线年龄和随访年龄来预测随访时的脑区厚度,并将它们与仅基于年龄的特定性别的标准横断面规范(C规范)进行比较。在2年和4年随访数据中的样本外测试表明,对于几乎所有皮质区域,B规范始终比C规范提供更好的拟合。B规范中的解释方差高于C规范。我们发现时间点之间没有显著差异(p = 0.45)。重复测量方差分析揭示了两个模型在高阶矩(例如,偏度和峰度)上的差异;例如,偏度因模型、性别、时间点及其相互作用而异。虽然仅拟合度的提高并不一定表明是一个优越的规范模型——因为规范模型旨在捕捉总体方差而不是简单地优化拟合——但我们证明了在B规范中有四个区域与青春期变化相关,而在C规范中则没有,这表明B规范对发育过程的敏感性增强。总之,我们的研究结果突出了B规范在捕捉纵向结构性脑变化中的规范变异方面的潜力。