Dos Santos Joana, Alsabban Abdulrahman, Maizels Max, Chua Michael, Vuppal Sunayna, Louca Emily, Perlmutar Martin, Knabl Jennifer, Rickard Mandy, Varghese Abby, Lorenzo Armando J, Koyle Martin Allan
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Front Urol. 2023 Jul 7;3:1199194. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1199194. eCollection 2023.
To our knowledge, no formal training combining didactic learning, simulation, and hands-on performance is available for practitioners performing neonatal circumcision. The absence of structured training may result in avoidable complications such as bleeding and penile injury. Herein, we present the results of a pilot neonatal circumcision training platform, offered either virtually or in person.
CIRCLES (CIRCumcision Learning Experience using Simulation) consist of 1. online didactic learning; 2. live simulation practice (in person or virtual coaching), and 3. clinical performance. Outcome measures included pre- and post-knowledge scores, self-efficacy questionnaires, and skill assessments of simulation and clinical performance (Likert rating). Face validity for training success was determined by an 80% passing score on the knowledge test and > 75% (mostly independent) performance.
For this pilot, we restricted enrolment to seven pediatric residents and one nurse practitioner. Wilcoxon Sum Rank test for non-parametric paired samples for pre-and post-knowledge tests showed a median increase of 20 points in post-knowledge tests (p=0.011). Upon completion of the simulation training, all participants (8/8) have chosen to perform circumcision with the GOMCO clamp. Both in-person (4/4) and virtual participants (4/4) performed >75% of simulation and clinical circumcision independently. Post-training self-efficacy Z scores were higher than pre-training scores, except for the management of bleeding.
The pilot CIRCLES learning shows face validity for both in-person and virtual training for neonatal circumcision. We plan to extend this platform to include more trainees and to offer them to established practitioners. The availability of formal training may ultimately reduce adverse outcomes.
据我们所知,目前没有针对实施新生儿包皮环切术的从业者的结合理论学习、模拟训练和实际操作的正规培训。缺乏结构化培训可能会导致诸如出血和阴茎损伤等可避免的并发症。在此,我们展示了一个新生儿包皮环切术培训试点平台的结果,该平台可通过线上或线下方式提供。
CIRCLES(使用模拟的包皮环切术学习体验)包括:1. 在线理论学习;2. 现场模拟练习(线下或虚拟指导),以及3. 临床操作。结果指标包括知识测试前后的分数、自我效能感问卷,以及模拟和临床操作的技能评估(李克特评分)。培训成功的表面效度由知识测试80%的及格分数和>75%(大多为独立操作)的操作表现来确定。
对于本次试点,我们将学员招募限制在7名儿科住院医师和1名执业护士。对知识测试前后的非参数配对样本进行的威尔科克森符号秩检验显示,知识测试后中位数提高了20分(p=0.011)。模拟训练完成后,所有参与者(8/8)都选择使用GOMCO夹进行包皮环切术。线下(4/4)和线上参与者(4/4)在模拟和临床包皮环切术中独立操作的比例均>75%。除出血处理外,培训后的自我效能感Z分数高于培训前分数。
CIRCLES学习试点表明,对于新生儿包皮环切术的线下和线上培训均具有表面效度。我们计划扩展这个平台,以纳入更多学员,并将其提供给有经验的从业者。正规培训的提供最终可能会减少不良后果。