• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年心理健康服务中人工智能应用的认知:定性研究

Perception of AI Use in Youth Mental Health Services: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Ding Xiaoxu, Barbic Skye

机构信息

Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 317-2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada, 1 2369928222.

Foundry, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2025 Aug 19;17:e69449. doi: 10.2196/69449.

DOI:10.2196/69449
PMID:40829148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has made significant advancements in health care. A key application of using artificial intelligence for health (AIH) is the use of AI-powered chatbots; however, empirical evidence on their effectiveness and feasibility remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study explored interest group perceptions of integrating AIH in youth mental health services, focusing on its potential benefits, challenges, usefulness, and regulatory implications.

METHODS

This qualitative study used semistructured in-depth interviews with 23 mobile health stakeholders, including youth users, service providers, and nonclinical staff from an integrated youths' service network. We used an inductive approach and thematic analysis to identify and summarize common themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

Participants identified AIH's potential to support education, navigation, and administrative tasks in health care, as well as to create safe spaces and mitigate health resource burdens. However, they expressed concerns about the lack of human elements, such as empathy and clinical judgment. Key challenges included privacy issues, unknown risks from rapid technological advancements, and insufficient crisis management for sensitive mental health cases. Participants viewed AIH's ability to mimic human behavior as a critical quality standard and emphasized the need for a robust evaluation framework combining objective metrics with subjective insights.

CONCLUSIONS

While AIH has the potential to improve health care access and experience, it cannot address all mental health challenges and may exacerbate existing issues. While AIH could complement less-complex services, it could not replace the therapeutic value of human interaction at this time. Co-design with end users is critical for successful AI integration. Robust evaluation frameworks and an iterative approach to build a learning health system are essential to refine AIH and ensure it aligns with real-world evolving needs.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)技术在医疗保健领域取得了重大进展。将人工智能用于健康领域(AIH)的一个关键应用是使用人工智能驱动的聊天机器人;然而,关于其有效性和可行性的实证证据仍然有限。

目的

本研究探讨了利益相关群体对将AIH整合到青少年心理健康服务中的看法,重点关注其潜在益处、挑战、实用性和监管影响。

方法

本定性研究对23名移动健康领域的利益相关者进行了半结构化深度访谈,这些利益相关者包括青少年用户、服务提供者以及来自综合青少年服务网络的非临床工作人员。我们采用归纳法和主题分析法来识别和总结共同主题及子主题。

结果

参与者认识到AIH在支持医疗保健中的教育、导航和行政任务,以及创建安全空间和减轻健康资源负担方面的潜力。然而,他们对缺乏人文因素表示担忧,如同理心和临床判断力。关键挑战包括隐私问题、快速技术进步带来的未知风险,以及对敏感心理健康案例的危机管理不足。参与者将AIH模仿人类行为的能力视为一项关键质量标准,并强调需要一个强大的评估框架,将客观指标与主观见解相结合。

结论

虽然AIH有潜力改善医疗保健的可及性和体验,但它无法解决所有心理健康挑战,甚至可能加剧现有问题。虽然AIH可以补充不太复杂的服务,但目前它无法取代人际互动的治疗价值。与最终用户共同设计对于成功整合人工智能至关重要。强大的评估框架和构建学习型健康系统的迭代方法对于完善AIH并确保其符合现实世界不断变化的需求至关重要。

相似文献

1
Perception of AI Use in Youth Mental Health Services: Qualitative Study.青少年心理健康服务中人工智能应用的认知:定性研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Aug 19;17:e69449. doi: 10.2196/69449.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
9
UK paediatric speech and language therapists' perceptions on the use of telehealth in current and future clinical practice: An application of the APEASE criteria.英国儿科言语治疗师对远程医疗在当前和未来临床实践中应用的看法:APPEASE 标准的应用。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1163-1179. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12988. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Ethical Challenges of Conversational AI in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.探索心理健康护理中对话式人工智能的伦理挑战:范围审查
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 21;12:e60432. doi: 10.2196/60432.
2
Responsible Design, Integration, and Use of Generative AI in Mental Health.生成式人工智能在心理健康领域的负责任设计、整合与应用。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 20;12:e70439. doi: 10.2196/70439.
3
Empathy Toward Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Experiences and the Role of Transparency in Mental Health and Social Support Chatbot Design: Comparative Study.对人工智能的同理心与人类体验以及透明度在心理健康和社交支持聊天机器人设计中的作用:比较研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 25;11:e62679. doi: 10.2196/62679.
4
Implementing Foundry: A cohort study describing the regional and virtual expansion of a youth integrated service in British Columbia, Canada.实施铸造厂计划:一项描述加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省青年综合服务的区域和虚拟扩展的队列研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;18(10):877-887. doi: 10.1111/eip.13538. Epub 2024 May 12.
5
A Comprehensive Evaluation of AI-Assisted Diagnostic Tools in ENT Medicine: Insights and Perspectives from Healthcare Professionals.耳鼻喉科医学中人工智能辅助诊断工具的综合评估:医疗保健专业人员的见解与观点
J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 28;14(4):354. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040354.
6
Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review.人工智能技术在医疗保健领域的伦理和监管挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e26297. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
7
A Systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.医疗保健领域人工智能实施障碍的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 4;15(10):e46454. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46454. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Artificial intelligence and increasing misinformation.人工智能与日益泛滥的错误信息。
Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;224(2):33-35. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.136.
9
AI will never convey the essence of human empathy.人工智能永远无法传达人类同理心的本质。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1808-1809. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01675-w.
10
Understanding Mobile Health and Youth Mental Health: Scoping Review.理解移动健康与青少年心理健康:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jun 16;11:e44951. doi: 10.2196/44951.