• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于整合具有高维协变量的多个队列的倾向得分的贝叶斯估计

Bayesian Estimation of Propensity Scores for Integrating Multiple Cohorts with High-Dimensional Covariates.

作者信息

Guha Subharup, Li Yi

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Rd, Gainesville, 32603, Florida, U.S.A..

Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, 48109, Michigan, U.S.A..

出版信息

Stat Biosci. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s12561-024-09470-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12561-024-09470-5
PMID:40857526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12320959/
Abstract

Comparative meta-analyses of groups of subjects by integrating multiple observational studies rely on estimated propensity scores (PSs) to mitigate covariate imbalances. However, PS estimation grapples with the theoretical and practical challenges posed by high-dimensional covariates. Motivated by an integrative analysis of breast cancer patients across seven medical centers, this paper tackles the challenges of integrating multiple observational datasets. The proposed inferential technique, called Bayesian Motif Submatrices for Covariates (B-MSC), addresses the curse of dimensionality by a hybrid of Bayesian and frequentist approaches. B-MSC uses nonparametric Bayesian "Chinese restaurant" processes to eliminate redundancy in the high-dimensional covariates and discover latent or lower-dimensional structures. With these motifs as potential predictors, standard regression techniques can be utilized to accurately infer the PSs and facilitate covariate-balanced group comparisons. Simulations and meta-analysis of the motivating cancer investigation demonstrate the efficacy of the B-MSC approach to accurately estimate the propensity scores and efficiently address covariate imbalance when integrating observational health studies with high-dimensional covariates.

摘要

通过整合多项观察性研究对受试者群体进行比较荟萃分析,依赖于估计倾向得分(PS)来减轻协变量不平衡。然而,PS估计面临高维协变量带来的理论和实际挑战。受对七个医疗中心的乳腺癌患者进行综合分析的启发,本文解决了整合多个观察性数据集的挑战。所提出的推理技术,称为协变量的贝叶斯基序子矩阵(B-MSC),通过贝叶斯和频率主义方法的混合来解决维度诅咒问题。B-MSC使用非参数贝叶斯“中餐厅”过程来消除高维协变量中的冗余,并发现潜在的或低维结构。以这些基序作为潜在预测因子,可以利用标准回归技术准确推断PS,并促进协变量平衡的组间比较。对激发性癌症研究的模拟和荟萃分析表明,B-MSC方法在整合具有高维协变量的观察性健康研究时,能够有效估计倾向得分并有效解决协变量不平衡问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb4a/12320959/1b9d5cb31470/nihms-2039357-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb4a/12320959/02945573c70b/nihms-2039357-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb4a/12320959/1b9d5cb31470/nihms-2039357-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb4a/12320959/02945573c70b/nihms-2039357-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb4a/12320959/1b9d5cb31470/nihms-2039357-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian Estimation of Propensity Scores for Integrating Multiple Cohorts with High-Dimensional Covariates.用于整合具有高维协变量的多个队列的倾向得分的贝叶斯估计
Stat Biosci. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s12561-024-09470-5.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
4
Bayesian dynamic power prior borrowing for augmenting a control arm for survival analysis.用于生存分析中增强对照臂的贝叶斯动态功率先验借用
J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Jun 26:1-22. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2025.2519153.
5
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
6
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.与随机试验中评估的医疗保健结果相比,观察性研究设计评估的医疗保健结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2.
7
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis.导航、机器人、患者特异性器械与标准截骨导板在 TKA 中准确性或结果评分是否存在差异?一项网络荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2105-2116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001324.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal meta-analysis by integrating multiple observational studies with multivariate outcomes.基于多变量结局的整合多个观察性研究的因果性荟萃分析。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae070.
2
Bayesian causal inference: a critical review.贝叶斯因果推断:批判性回顾。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 May 15;381(2247):20220153. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0153. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Data Integration in Causal Inference.因果推断中的数据整合
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2023 Jan-Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1002/wics.1581. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
4
Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.同时针对潜在混杂因素进行变量选择和测量误差处理,估计平均处理效应。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):691-711. doi: 10.1177/09622802221146308. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Efficient and robust methods for causally interpretable meta-analysis: Transporting inferences from multiple randomized trials to a target population.高效稳健的因果可解释荟萃分析方法:将多个随机试验的推论推广到目标人群。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):1057-1072. doi: 10.1111/biom.13716. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
6
Estimating the marginal hazard ratio by simultaneously using a set of propensity score models: A multiply robust approach.同时使用一组倾向评分模型估计边缘危险比:一种多重稳健方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 28;40(5):1224-1242. doi: 10.1002/sim.8837. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
A practical introduction to Bayesian estimation of causal effects: Parametric and nonparametric approaches.因果效应的贝叶斯估计实用介绍:参数化和非参数化方法
Stat Med. 2021 Jan 30;40(2):518-551. doi: 10.1002/sim.8761. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
8
High-Dimensional Confounding Adjustment Using Continuous Spike and Slab Priors.使用连续尖峰和平板先验的高维混杂调整
Bayesian Anal. 2019 Sep;14(3):805-828. doi: 10.1214/18-ba1131. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Analysis of Tumor Biology to Advance Cancer Health Disparity Research.肿瘤生物学分析促进癌症健康差异研究。
Am J Pathol. 2018 Feb;188(2):304-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
Transportability of Trial Results Using Inverse Odds of Sampling Weights.使用抽样权重的逆概率进行试验结果的可转移性
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 15;186(8):1010-1014. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx164.