Southerland Lauren T, Beck Adrienne S, Ganz Ellie K, Pasadyn Cassandra L, Wollenberg Steven, Young Henry W
Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2530439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30439.
Hospital-based security teams assist emergency department (ED) staff when there is a risk to staff or patient safety.
To describe the current practice of hospital security assistance during emergency mental health care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study with mixed methods was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of patients in the ED for mental health concerns who received involuntary sedation from 2020 to 2021. Any ED note documenting security presence or calls was abstracted as a text snippet. Hospital security data logs were also queried for the same time frame and summarized. Data were analyzed from February to November 2024.
Outcomes included type and quantity of hospital security calls to the ED. A deductive quality analysis was performed with the goal of assessing current clinical documentation practices as an initial step toward improvement. The deductive coding of text snippets began with 10 codes, including verbal threats, physical aggression, and elopement.
Over the 2 years, hospital security had 9288 clinical support encounters in the ED (mean, 12.7 encounters per day). The parent electronic health record abstraction study included 334 patients, of which 244 patients (73.1%) had hospital security involved in their care and so were included in this analysis (146 men [59.8%]; mean [SD] age, 34.5 [13.6] years). Among the study subset, 135 patients (55.3%) were brought to the ED by police. Security was most often called for physical violence (82 patients [33.6%]). De-escalation attempts occurred by ED staff for 29 patients (11.9%) and security personnel for 17 patients (7.0%). Theme 1 was safety: patient-on-patient violence was a new finding: "...this patient stood up out of her chair, ran over to another patient and started punching another patient." Theme 2 was patients who are unwilling or unable to adhere to the care plan. Disagreement with disposition plans or medical care was a frequent trigger of violence. Theme 3 was that de-escalation attempts were not well documented. "Security called to bedside… [nurse] able to talk patient down at this time." Theme 4 included legal issues: security assisted with the disposal of illicit substances and use of security body cameras to document patient belongings.
In this study, security teams contributed to the safety of ED staff and patients. This single-center study's findings suggest the need for future improvements, including improving the documentation of de-escalation techniques used and developing better ways to reduce violence from care plan disagreements.
当工作人员或患者安全面临风险时,医院安保团队会协助急诊科(ED)工作人员。
描述紧急心理健康护理期间医院安保协助的当前做法。
设计、设置和参与者:这项采用混合方法的定性研究是对2020年至2021年在急诊科因心理健康问题接受非自愿镇静的患者进行的回顾性队列研究的二次分析。任何记录安保人员在场或呼叫的急诊科记录都被提取为文本片段。还查询了同一时间段的医院安保数据日志并进行了总结。数据于2024年2月至11月进行分析。
结果包括医院安保部门呼叫急诊科的类型和数量。进行了演绎性质量分析,目的是评估当前的临床记录做法,作为改进的第一步。文本片段的演绎编码从10个代码开始,包括口头威胁、身体攻击和逃跑。
在这两年中,医院安保部门在急诊科有9288次临床支持接触(平均每天12.7次接触)。母本电子健康记录摘要研究包括334名患者,其中244名患者(73.1%)在其护理过程中有医院安保人员参与,因此被纳入本分析(146名男性[59.8%];平均[标准差]年龄,34.5[13.6]岁)。在研究子集中,135名患者(55.3%)由警方送往急诊科。安保部门最常因身体暴力而被呼叫(82名患者[33.6%])。急诊科工作人员对29名患者(11.9%)进行了缓和局势尝试,安保人员对17名患者(7.0%)进行了缓和局势尝试。主题1是安全:患者对患者的暴力是一个新发现:“……这名患者从椅子上站起来,跑到另一名患者身边,开始殴打另一名患者。”主题2是不愿意或无法遵守护理计划的患者。对出院计划或医疗护理的分歧是暴力的常见触发因素。主题3是缓和局势尝试记录不完善。“安保人员被叫到床边……[护士]此时能够说服患者冷静下来。”主题4包括法律问题:安保人员协助处理非法物质,并使用安保人员的随身摄像头记录患者的财物。
在本研究中,安保团队为急诊科工作人员和患者的安全做出了贡献。这项单中心研究的结果表明未来需要改进,包括改进对所使用的缓和局势技术的记录,以及开发更好的方法来减少因护理计划分歧导致的暴力。