Senol Yigit Can, Ciftci Halis Emre, Oz Zeynep Gence, Duman Dilara, Sayin Bige, Akmangit Ilkay, Ozbakir Musa Onur, Divanlioglu Denizhan, Belen Ahmet Deniz, Daglioglu Ergun
Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Health Sciences Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Sep 1;167(1):235. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06647-9.
Anterior choroidal artery (AChoA) aneurysms are rare and pose a significant treatment challenge due to the artery's small caliber and critical vascular territory. Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become a preferred approach, but optimal management strategies remain debated. This study compares the efficacy and safety of different EVT techniques, including primary coiling, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), and flow diversion (FD), in treating AChoA aneurysms.
Patients were categorized by endovascular technique, aneurysm morphology, and rupture status. Angiographic occlusion rates were assessed using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Scale (RROS), and clinical outcomes were measured via the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and follow-ups. Statistical analyses compared occlusion rates, procedural complications, and functional outcomes among treatment groups.
In this study, 60 patients with 80 anterior choroidal artery aneurysms were treated. Among these, 44 aneurysms (55%) were classified as dependent, meaning the choroidal branch arose from the aneurysm dome or neck, while 36 aneurysms (45%) were independent, originating from the carotid artery near the choroidal branch. Primary coiling was used in 29 cases, stent-assisted coiling (SAC) in 21, and flow diversion (FD), with or without additional coiling, in 30 cases. Complete occlusion rates were significantly higher with SAC (83.3%) and FD (76.1%) compared to primary coiling (31.8%) (p < 0.05). Flow diversion was associated with more technical complications (25%), and ischemic events were more common in dependent aneurysms (p < 0.05). Importantly, no cases of symptomatic AChoA occlusion occurred after FD treatment. The overall mortality rate was 5%, with all deaths occurring in the primary coiling group among patients with ruptured aneurysms.
EVT of AChoA aneurysms is effective, with SAC and FD demonstrating superior occlusion rates compared to primary coiling. FD carries a higher risk of technical complications but maintains AChoA patency. To optimize outcomes, treatment choice should be guided by aneurysm morphology and patient risk factors.
脉络膜前动脉(AChoA)动脉瘤较为罕见,因其动脉管径小且血管区域关键,治疗颇具挑战。血管内治疗(EVT)已成为首选方法,但最佳管理策略仍存在争议。本研究比较了不同EVT技术,包括单纯弹簧圈栓塞、支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞(SAC)和血流导向(FD),在治疗AChoA动脉瘤方面的疗效和安全性。
根据血管内技术、动脉瘤形态和破裂状态对患者进行分类。使用雷蒙德 - 罗伊闭塞量表(RROS)评估血管造影闭塞率,并通过改良Rankin量表(mRS)在出院时和随访时测量临床结局。统计分析比较了治疗组之间的闭塞率、手术并发症和功能结局。
本研究共治疗了60例患者的80个脉络膜前动脉动脉瘤。其中,44个动脉瘤(55%)被归类为依赖型,即脉络膜分支起源于动脉瘤瘤顶或颈部,而36个动脉瘤(45%)为独立型,起源于脉络膜分支附近的颈动脉。29例采用单纯弹簧圈栓塞,21例采用支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞(SAC),30例采用血流导向(FD),其中部分病例还进行了额外的弹簧圈栓塞。与单纯弹簧圈栓塞(31.8%)相比,SAC(83.3%)和FD(76.1%)的完全闭塞率显著更高(p < 0.05)。血流导向与更多的技术并发症相关(25%),缺血事件在依赖型动脉瘤中更常见(p < 0.05)。重要的是,FD治疗后未发生有症状的AChoA闭塞病例。总死亡率为5%,所有死亡均发生在破裂动脉瘤患者的单纯弹簧圈栓塞组中。
AChoA动脉瘤的EVT是有效的,与单纯弹簧圈栓塞相比,SAC和FD显示出更高的闭塞率。FD技术并发症风险较高,但能保持AChoA通畅。为优化治疗效果,治疗选择应根据动脉瘤形态和患者风险因素来指导。