Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer via intratumoral and peritumoral multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging machine learning-based radiomics with Shapley additive explanations interpretability analysis.

BACKGROUND

The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast cancer has been well-documented in the literature. However, the majority of the related studies have primarily focused on intratumoral characteristics, overlooking the potential contribution of peritumoral features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multiparametric MRI in predicting LVI by analyzing both intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features and to assess the added value of incorporating both regions in LVI prediction.

METHODS

A total of 366 patients underwent preoperative breast MRI from two centers and were divided into training (n=208), validation (n=70), and test (n=88) sets. Imaging features were extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Five models were developed for predicting LVI status based on logistic regression: the tumor area (TA) model, peritumoral area (PA) model, tumor-plus-peritumoral area (TPA) model, clinical model, and combined model. The combined model was created incorporating the highest radiomics score and clinical factors. Predictive efficacy was evaluated via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC). The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was used to rank the features and explain the final model.

RESULTS

The performance of the TPA model was superior to that of the TA and PA models. A combined model was further developed via multivariable logistic regression, with the TPA radiomics score (radscore), MRI-assessed axillary lymph node (ALN) status, and peritumoral edema (PE) being incorporated. The combined model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination performance across the training, validation, and test datasets, with AUCs of 0.888 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.841-0.934], 0.856 (95% CI: 0.769-0.943), and 0.853 (95% CI: 0.760-0.946), respectively. Furthermore, we conducted SHAP analysis to evaluate the contributions of TPA radscore, MRI-ALN status, and PE in LVI status prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined model, incorporating clinical factors and intratumoral and peritumoral radscore, effectively predicts LVI and may potentially aid in tailored treatment planning.