• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经棘突直接中线劈开后的全内镜下椎管减压:技术要点

Full-Endoscopic Spinal Canal Decompression After Direct Midline Splitting of the Spinous Process: A Technical Note.

作者信息

Okumura Eitaro, Maegawa Tatsuya, Nakayama Yosuke, Hayase Hitoshi, Kubota Motoo

机构信息

Spinal Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Aug 8;17(8):e89648. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89648. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.89648
PMID:40922836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414615/
Abstract

For lumbar spinal canal stenosis, endoscopic spine surgery typically employs a unilateral approach. While this approach has the advantage of early access to the lamina, it risks damage to the facet joint on the entry side. Additionally, decompression of the ipsilateral lateral recess can be challenging, sometimes resulting in inadequate decompression laterally, leading to incomplete symptom relief. To address these issues, a midline approach after midline splitting of the spinous process has been developed. However, this technique often uses a relatively large 16mm cylindrical retractor, resulting in skin incisions of approximately 20-25mm according to various reports. In our case, we performed a full-endoscopic spinal canal decompression underwater using a 7mm diameter through a 12mm skin incision, after directly splitting the spinous process along the midline. This technique achieved sufficient decompression with favorable outcomes. We report the details of this less invasive surgical procedure. The patient was a 62-year-old male who was independent in activities of daily living with a history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. This patient underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis eight years ago. He had experienced pain in the left groin and perineal area (Numerical Rating Scale 6) for five months without improvement, which led him to our outpatient clinic. At the time of his visit, there was no apparent muscle weakness in either lower limb, only sensory disturbance. Lumbar MRI examination led to a diagnosis of lumbar spinal canal stenosis (L1/2) and conus medullaris syndrome. He requested endoscopic treatment, and we decided to perform an underwater full-endoscopic spinal canal decompression. The surgery involved a 12mm midline skin incision and direct splitting of the spinous process (L1) by approximately 10mm using a chisel and hammer. After placing a straight sheath, trumpet-shaped laminectomy was performed under endoscopic visualization. Trumpet-shaped refers to a laminectomy technique where the surgical field gradually widens as bone removal progresses deeper into the lamina. The yellow ligaments on both sides were removed as much as possible, resulting in sufficient decompression. Both facet joints were preserved, and extensive decompression was achieved. Postoperatively, although the patient still had some perineal pressure sensation, the sensory disturbance in the groin area improved, and he was discharged home on the second postoperative day with a modified Rankin Scale of 1. We report a case of successful spinal canal decompression using an endoscopic approach after midline splitting of the spinous process for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. We consider this surgical method to be valuable as it is less invasive, provides a good symmetrical view, and allows sufficient decompression on both sides.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/ac288e5ee8af/cureus-0017-00000089648-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/e48d48f02da9/cureus-0017-00000089648-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/840870a31f68/cureus-0017-00000089648-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/0eeca7d03bd8/cureus-0017-00000089648-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/92c7387ac30a/cureus-0017-00000089648-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/5bdb32975e03/cureus-0017-00000089648-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/ac288e5ee8af/cureus-0017-00000089648-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/e48d48f02da9/cureus-0017-00000089648-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/840870a31f68/cureus-0017-00000089648-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/0eeca7d03bd8/cureus-0017-00000089648-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/92c7387ac30a/cureus-0017-00000089648-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/5bdb32975e03/cureus-0017-00000089648-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/724a/12414615/ac288e5ee8af/cureus-0017-00000089648-i06.jpg
摘要

对于腰椎管狭窄症,内镜脊柱手术通常采用单侧入路。虽然这种入路具有早期进入椎板的优势,但有损伤进入侧小关节的风险。此外,同侧侧隐窝的减压可能具有挑战性,有时会导致外侧减压不充分,从而导致症状缓解不完全。为了解决这些问题,已经开发出一种在棘突中线劈开后采用中线入路的方法。然而,这种技术通常使用相对较大的16mm圆柱形牵开器,根据各种报告,会导致约20 - 25mm的皮肤切口。在我们的病例中,我们在沿中线直接劈开棘突后,通过一个12mm的皮肤切口,使用直径7mm的器械进行了水下全内镜椎管减压。该技术实现了充分减压并取得了良好的效果。我们报告了这种微创外科手术的详细情况。患者为一名62岁男性,日常生活自理,有退行性椎体滑脱病史。该患者八年前因L4/5退行性椎体滑脱接受了后路腰椎椎间融合术。他左侧腹股沟和会阴区疼痛(数字评分量表评分为6分)五个月,无改善,遂到我们门诊就诊。就诊时,双下肢无明显肌肉无力,仅有感觉障碍。腰椎MRI检查诊断为腰椎管狭窄症(L1/2)和圆锥综合征。他要求进行内镜治疗,我们决定进行水下全内镜椎管减压。手术包括一个12mm的中线皮肤切口,并用凿子和锤子将棘突(L1)直接劈开约10mm。放置直鞘后,在内镜直视下进行喇叭形椎板切除术。喇叭形是指一种椎板切除技术,随着骨切除向椎板深部推进,手术视野逐渐变宽。尽可能多地切除两侧的黄韧带,实现了充分减压。保留了双侧小关节,实现了广泛减压。术后,尽管患者仍有一些会阴区压迫感,但腹股沟区的感觉障碍有所改善,术后第二天出院,改良Rankin量表评分为1分。我们报告了一例在棘突中线劈开后采用内镜入路成功进行椎管减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的病例。我们认为这种手术方法很有价值,因为它创伤小、视野对称良好,并且能在两侧实现充分减压。

相似文献

1
Full-Endoscopic Spinal Canal Decompression After Direct Midline Splitting of the Spinous Process: A Technical Note.经棘突直接中线劈开后的全内镜下椎管减压:技术要点
Cureus. 2025 Aug 8;17(8):e89648. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89648. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Central and Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis: A Combined Uni-Portal and Bi-Portal Approach.经皮内镜减压治疗腰椎中央及侧隐窝椎管狭窄症:单通道与双通道联合入路
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jul 17;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00002. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.与传统椎板切除术相比,后路减压技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD010036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010036.pub2.
5
[Our experience with minimally invasive decompression spine surgeries performed with microscopic and endoscopic visualization].[我们使用显微镜和内镜可视化技术进行微创脊柱减压手术的经验]
Orv Hetil. 2023 Dec 10;164(49):1926-1937. doi: 10.1556/650.2023.32926.
6
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy.内镜下颈椎后路椎间孔切开术及椎间盘切除术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jun 25;15(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00003. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
7
Translaminar contralateral endoscopic foraminotomy for foraminal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation at L5-S1.经椎板对侧内镜下椎间孔切开术治疗L5-S1椎间孔狭窄和腰椎间盘突出症
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 25;141:111566. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111566.
8
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Interlaminar Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study of 176 Cases With a 3-6 Year Follow-Up.
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1111/os.70131.
10
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-Scale Comparative Study Between Microendoscopic Laminectomy and Full-Endoscopic Laminectomy for the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.显微镜下椎板切除术与全内镜下椎板切除术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的大规模对比研究
Cureus. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):e52842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52842. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Microendoscopic Lumbar Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review.微创腰椎后路减压手术治疗腰椎狭窄症:文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 4;58(3):384. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030384.
3
Comparative study between full-endoscopic laminectomy and microendoscopic laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
全内镜下椎板切除术与显微内镜下椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;6(2):E3-E11. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-620.
4
Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery for the Treatment of Lumbar Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum: Technical Report.全内镜脊柱手术治疗黄韧带骨化:技术报告。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:487-494.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.132. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Full-endoscopic (bi-portal or uni-portal) versus microscopic lumbar decompression laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.全内镜(双入路或单入路)与显微镜下腰椎减压椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):595-611. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02604-2. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note.经中线入路内镜辅助下管状手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术要点。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2105-12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2806-5. Epub 2013 May 7.
7
Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.腰椎管狭窄症显微内镜下减压椎板切除术的中期疗效:4年前瞻性研究
Neurosurgery. 2009 Jul;65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000347007.95725.6F.
8
Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.改良单侧入路显微内镜下中线减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的术后疗效
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Apr;10(4):293-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.1.SPINE08288.
9
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression.退行性腰椎管狭窄症:374例行单侧椎板切开双侧显微减压术患者的结果分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Dec;7(6):579-86. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/12/579.
10
Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note.腰椎管狭窄症的显微内镜下后路减压短期疗效。技术说明。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 May;2(5):624-33. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.5.0624.