Sanna Marco
Consort Psychiatr. 2025 Mar 5;6(1):47-54. doi: 10.17816/CP15606. eCollection 2025.
Yuri Lotman (1922-1993) was a semiologist, literary critic, and cultural historian from Soviet Russia. He is credited with founding the multidisciplinary Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics. As a cultural theorist and humanist, he was highly influential across many fields, but his contributions to theories about the brain as a semiotic system have often been overlooked. Topics such as the asymmetry of the brain hemispheres, the "untranslatable" specialization of their respective "languages", interhemispheric dialogue, and the unity of consciousness were frequent subjects of discussion within the scientific community that formed around the multidisciplinary Tartu-Moscow (and Leningrad) group. Recently, scholars such as E. Andrews and T.V. Chernigovskaya have highlighted the influence and relevance of the "neurosemiotic" model proposed by Yu.M. Lotman in the late 1970s. However, our impression is that a fundamental aspect, which Yu.M. Lotman considered indispensable for the functioning of any "thinking system", has been overlooked in the application of this model to contemporary studies of neurophysiology. This aspect is the intersemiotic translation device that Yu.M. Lotman calls the "semiotic boundary". We can consider this as a "third" structure of intersection between the two hemispheres, which actively operates to translate specialized information systems reciprocally. In this paper, we will attempt to restore its significance according to an interpretation updated to the most recent discoveries in cognitive neuroscience.
尤里·洛特曼(1922 - 1993)是一位来自苏联俄罗斯的符号学家、文学批评家和文化史学家。他被誉为多学科塔尔图 - 莫斯科符号学学派的创始人。作为一名文化理论家和人文主义者,他在许多领域都极具影响力,但他对大脑作为符号系统的理论贡献却常常被忽视。诸如大脑半球的不对称性、它们各自“语言”的“不可翻译”的专业化、半球间对话以及意识的统一性等话题,是围绕多学科塔尔图 - 莫斯科(以及列宁格勒)小组形成的科学界内经常讨论的主题。最近,像E. 安德鲁斯和T.V. 切尔尼戈夫斯卡娅等学者强调了尤里·M. 洛特曼在20世纪70年代末提出的“神经符号学”模型的影响和相关性。然而,我们的印象是,在将这个模型应用于当代神经生理学研究时,尤里·M. 洛特曼认为对任何“思维系统”运作不可或缺的一个基本方面被忽视了。这个方面就是尤里·M. 洛特曼所称的“符号边界”的符号间翻译装置。我们可以将其视为两个半球之间交叉的“第三种”结构,它积极运作以相互翻译专门的信息系统。在本文中,我们将尝试根据对认知神经科学最新发现的更新解释来恢复其重要性。