Rimawi Asmaa, Sung Anne, Pike Morgan, Lin Erica, Haidar David A, Chen Chiu-Mei, Medlin Richard, Perry Marcia, Fung Christopher M
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Aug 29;6(5):100239. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100239. eCollection 2025 Oct.
We assessed time to provider (TTP) for patients with a non-English language preference (NELP) compared to patients with an English language preference (ELP) in the emergency department (ED).
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults presenting between 2019 and 2023 to a large urban ED. We used a 2-step classification that first identified NELP from patients' reported language at registration, followed by identification in the narrative text of the triage note. We compared TTP among patients with a triage note-identified NELP, triage note-unidentified NELP, and ELP, including at night and during times of ED crowding.
Among 262,203 visits, 8227 were patients with a NELP, of which 3375 were triage note-identified NELP. The median TTP was 11 minutes for patients with an ELP (95% CI, 11-11), 15 minutes for triage note-identified NELP (14-16), and 13 minutes for triage note-unidentified NELP (12-14). During times of ED crowding, patients with an ELP had a median TTP of 12 minutes (95% CI, 12-12) compared with 21 minutes for patients with a triage note-identified NELP (17-27) and 17 minutes for those with a triage note-unidentified NELP (14-20). At nighttime, the median TTP was 19 minutes for patients with an ELP (95% CI, 19-19) compared with 28 minutes for triage note-identified NELP (25-32) and 25 minutes for triage note-unidentified NELP (22-28).
Patients with a NELP experience longer TTP, especially those whose triage note identifies their language status. ED crowding and nighttime are associated with further increases in TTP among patients with a NELP.
我们评估了急诊科(ED)中语言偏好为非英语(NELP)的患者与语言偏好为英语(ELP)的患者获得医疗服务提供者诊治的时间(TTP)。
我们对2019年至2023年间到一家大型城市急诊科就诊的成年人进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们采用两步分类法,首先根据患者登记时报告的语言确定NELP,然后在分诊记录的叙述文本中进行识别。我们比较了分诊记录中确定为NELP的患者、分诊记录中未确定为NELP的患者和ELP患者之间的TTP,包括夜间和急诊科拥挤时段。
在262,203次就诊中,有8227名患者语言偏好为非英语,其中3375名是分诊记录中确定为NELP的患者。ELP患者的TTP中位数为11分钟(95%CI,11 - 11),分诊记录中确定为NELP的患者为15分钟(14 - 16),分诊记录中未确定为NELP的患者为13分钟(12 - 14)。在急诊科拥挤时段,ELP患者的TTP中位数为12分钟(95%CI,12 - 12),而分诊记录中确定为NELP的患者为21分钟(17 - 27),分诊记录中未确定为NELP的患者为17分钟(14 - 20)。在夜间,ELP患者的TTP中位数为19分钟(95%CI,19 - 19),而分诊记录中确定为NELP的患者为28分钟(25 - 32),分诊记录中未确定为NELP的患者为25分钟(22 - 28)。
语言偏好为非英语的患者获得医疗服务提供者诊治的时间更长,尤其是那些分诊记录中确定了其语言状态的患者。急诊科拥挤和夜间会使语言偏好为非英语的患者的TTP进一步增加。