Suppr超能文献

较高的心率强度会对小场地比赛中的战术决策和技术准确性产生负面影响:一项关于场地大小和得分方法操纵效果的研究。

Higher Heart Rate Intensity Can Negatively Impact Tactical Decision-Making and Technical Accuracy in Small-Sided Games: A Study on The Effects of Field Size and Scoring Method Manipulation.

作者信息

Qiao Wei, Hua Kai, Zhang Jincheng, Song Dingding, Li Jie, Chen Xiaolong, Liang Dong

机构信息

College of Physical Education, Anqing Normal University, Anqing, China.

School of Social Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):522-531. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.522. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

This study investigated how varying task constraints - pitch size and the presence of a goal - affect psychophysiological intensity, technical execution, and tactical decision-making in small-sided games (SSGs). The study also examined correlations between intensities and technical and tactical performance. Thirty-six regional-level male youth soccer players (aged 16.5 ± 0.5 years) participated in a four-week intervention using a non-controlled, repeated-measures design within a single cohort. Players completed 3v3 SSGs under six conditions combining three pitch sizes (75, 100, and 125 m per player) and two task goals (ball possession vs. small goals). Each session included standardized warm-ups and three 4-minute bouts per condition. Psychophysiological responses were measured via Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and heart rate monitoring (HRmean, % time in Zone 5). Technical actions (passes, receptions, dribbles, shots) and tactical decision-making (Passing Decision-Making index) were assessed through video-based analysis. Significant interactions (p < 0.001) between field size and scoring method were found for HR measures and passing. Ball possession games showed higher HRmean and HR Zone 5 across all field sizes compared to small-goal games (p < 0.001). However, even in small-goal games, HRmean and HR Zone 5 significantly increased with larger field sizes (p < 0.001). Small-goal games resulted in more successful dribbles (p < 0.001), with fewer successful passes on the smallest field. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HRmean and successful shots (r = -0.346, p = 0.039), and between time in HR Zone 5 and the passing decision-making index (r = -0.363, p = 0.029). The study suggests that both field size and scoring method significantly influence players' physiological responses, technical performance, and decision-making. Ball possession games and larger fields increase physical intensity and passing success, while smaller fields and small-goal games promote dribbling. However, higher physiological strain appears to negatively impact shooting effectiveness and decision-making quality, although these correlations are moderate and no definitive conclusions can be drawn or generalized.

摘要

本研究调查了不同的任务限制条件——场地大小和目标的存在——如何影响小型比赛(SSG)中的心理生理强度、技术执行和战术决策。该研究还考察了强度与技术和战术表现之间的相关性。36名地区级男性青年足球运动员(年龄16.5±0.5岁)参与了一项为期四周的干预研究,采用单队列内的非对照重复测量设计。球员们在六种条件下完成3对3的小型比赛,这六种条件结合了三种场地大小(每人75米、100米和125米)和两种任务目标(控球与小目标)。每次训练包括标准化热身以及每种条件下的三轮4分钟比赛。通过主观用力感觉评分(RPE)和心率监测(平均心率、在第5区的时间百分比)来测量心理生理反应。通过基于视频的分析评估技术动作(传球、接球、运球、射门)和战术决策(传球决策指数)。在心率测量和传球方面发现了场地大小与得分方法之间的显著交互作用(p<0.001)。与小目标比赛相比,控球游戏在所有场地大小下的平均心率(HRmean)和第5区心率(HR Zone 5)都更高(p<0.001)。然而,即使在小目标比赛中,平均心率和第5区心率也随着场地变大而显著增加(p<0.001)。小目标比赛导致更多成功的运球(p<0.001),在最小的场地上成功传球较少。在平均心率与成功射门之间观察到中度负相关(r=-0.346,p=0.039),在第5区心率时间与传球决策指数之间也观察到中度负相关(r=-0.363,p=0.029)。该研究表明,场地大小和得分方法都显著影响球员的生理反应、技术表现和决策。控球游戏和较大场地会增加身体强度和传球成功率,而较小场地和小目标比赛则促进运球。然而,较高的生理应激似乎对射门效率和决策质量有负面影响,尽管这些相关性是中度的,无法得出明确结论或进行推广。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Physiological, Physical and Technical Demands During Sided Soccer Game Formats: a Review.
Int J Sports Med. 2025 Sep;46(10):710-741. doi: 10.1055/a-2591-6995. Epub 2025 Apr 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验