Gale Jessica, Roblain Antoine, Staerklé Christian
University of Lausanne, CH.
UniversitéLibre de Bruxelles, BE.
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;38:2. doi: 10.5334/irsp.941. eCollection 2025.
Opposition to multiculturalism is common among native majorities. Normatively, this group-based political theory and public policy has been described as being incompatible with the individual justice-based orientation of Western liberal societies. In this research, we account for national majority opposition to multiculturalism by arguing that national identities in classically liberal societies are primarily associated with individual justice beliefs, in opposition to group-based justice beliefs. A correlational ( = 91) and an experimental ( = 172) study in Switzerland first show that the relationship between national identification and opposition to multiculturalism is partially explained by a belief in individual responsibility, a key facet of individual justice. This result was replicated using representative Swiss data from the World Values Survey ( = 1241), as well as in Belgium ( = 362), another Western liberal society. Effects transcended an ethnic conception of national identity and provide a novel perspective on majority multicultural attitudes as rooted in group-based conceptions of social justice.
本土多数群体中反对多元文化主义的情况很常见。从规范的角度来看,这种基于群体的政治理论和公共政策被认为与西方自由社会基于个人正义的取向不相容。在本研究中,我们通过论证经典自由社会中的民族身份主要与个人正义信念相关联,而非基于群体的正义信念,来解释民族多数群体对多元文化主义的反对。瑞士的一项相关性研究(n = 91)和一项实验性研究(n = 172)首先表明,民族认同与反对多元文化主义之间的关系部分是由对个人责任的信念所解释的,个人责任是个人正义的一个关键方面。这一结果在使用来自世界价值观调查的瑞士代表性数据(n = 1241)以及在另一个西方自由社会比利时(n = 362)中得到了重复验证。这些效应超越了民族身份的种族概念,并为多数群体的多元文化态度提供了一个新的视角,即这些态度植根于基于群体的社会正义概念。