Abdou Mostafa, Sahi Razia S, Hull Thomas D, Nook Erik C, Daw Nathaniel D
Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, US.
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, US.
Comput Psychiatr. 2025 Sep 9;9(1):187-209. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.141. eCollection 2025.
Developing precise, innocuous markers of psychopathology and the processes that foster effective treatment would greatly advance the field's ability to detect and intervene on psychopathology. However, a central challenge in this area is that both assessment and treatment are conducted primarily in natural language, a medium that makes quantitative measurement difficult. Although recent advances have been made, much existing research in this area has been limited by reliance on previous-generation psycholinguistic tools. Here we build on previous work that identified a linguistic measure of "psychological distancing" (that is, viewing a negative situation as separated from oneself) in client language, which was associated with improved emotion regulation in laboratory settings and treatment progress in real-world therapeutic transcripts (Nook et al., 2017, 2022). However, this formulation was based on context-insensitive word count-based measures of distancing (pronoun person and verb tense), which limits the ability to detect more abstract expressions of psychological distance, such as counterfactual or conditional statements. This approach also leaves open many questions about how therapists' - likely subtler - language can effectively guide clients toward increased psychological distance. We address these gaps by introducing the use of appropriately prompted large language models (LLMs) to measure linguistic distance, and we compare these results to those obtained using traditional word-counting techniques. Our results show that LLMs offer a more nuanced and context-sensitive approach to assessing language, significantly enhancing our ability to model the relations between linguistic distance and symptoms. Moreover, this approach enables us to expand the scope of analysis beyond client language to shed insight into how therapists' language relates to client outcomes. Specifically, the LLM was able to detect ways in which a therapist's language encouraged a client to adopt distanced perspectives-rather than simply detecting the therapist themselves being distanced. This measure also reliably tracked the severity of patient symptoms, highlighting the potential of LLM-powered linguistic analysis to deepen our understanding of therapeutic processes.
开发精确、无害的精神病理学标志物以及促进有效治疗的过程,将极大地提升该领域检测和干预精神病理学的能力。然而,这一领域的一个核心挑战在于,评估和治疗主要通过自然语言进行,而自然语言这种媒介使得定量测量变得困难。尽管最近取得了进展,但该领域的许多现有研究因依赖上一代心理语言学工具而受到限制。在此,我们基于之前的研究成果展开,该研究在来访者语言中识别出一种“心理距离”的语言测量方法(即将负面情况视为与自身分离),这种方法在实验室环境中与情绪调节的改善以及现实世界治疗记录中的治疗进展相关(努克等人,2017年、2022年)。然而,这种表述是基于对距离的上下文不敏感的基于词数的测量方法(代词人称和动词时态),这限制了检测心理距离更抽象表达的能力,比如反事实或条件陈述。这种方法也留下了许多问题,比如治疗师可能更微妙的语言如何能有效地引导来访者增加心理距离。我们通过引入使用适当提示的大语言模型(LLM)来测量语言距离来填补这些空白,并将这些结果与使用传统词数技术获得的结果进行比较。我们的结果表明,大语言模型为评估语言提供了一种更细致入微且上下文敏感的方法,显著增强了我们对语言距离与症状之间关系进行建模的能力。此外,这种方法使我们能够将分析范围从来访者语言扩展到深入了解治疗师的语言与来访者结果之间的关系。具体而言,大语言模型能够检测出治疗师的语言鼓励来访者采取距离视角的方式——而不仅仅是检测治疗师自身是否保持距离。这种测量方法还可靠地跟踪了患者症状的严重程度,凸显了由大语言模型驱动的语言分析在深化我们对治疗过程理解方面的潜力。