Berthon Katherine, Wade Ruth, Chapman Pippa, Jaworski Coline C, Leake Jonathan R, McHugh Niamh, Collins Lisa, Daniell Tim, Zhao Yu, Watt Penelope, Doherty Bob, Jackson Peter, Dicks Lynn V
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Sep 18;380(1935):20240157. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0157.
Regenerative agriculture aims to produce food while simultaneously improving soil health, supporting biodiversity, reducing input costs and enhancing climate resilience. Evidence on its environmental and socio-economic impacts across different systems and climates remains limited, with few studies measuring multiple outcomes following whole farming system transition. To be impactful, regenerative agriculture research must address farmers' knowledge needs and provide practically feasible, economically viable solutions. This can be achieved through action-based research, co-designed with farmer stakeholders in real-world settings. Such research is time-consuming and involves potential risk for farmers adopting new practice combinations. Here, we describe two UK research projects gathering evidence on regenerative agriculture in partnership with farmers, at different scales. One is a replicated large-plot trial that stacks regenerative principles, the other a farmer-led quasi-experiment, following the transition in active farm businesses and using a flexible scoring system based on regenerative principles. We highlight benefits, challenges and future research directions emerging from these projects, including: challenges defining regenerative agriculture; co-design and maximizing knowledge exchange; generalizing results beyond study sites, when practices and outcomes are context-dependent; the need for interdisciplinarity; and generating evidence on long-term transitions with time lags between system change and outcomes, in an environment of short-term funding.This article is part of the theme issue 'Transforming terrestrial food systems for human and planetary health'.
再生农业旨在生产粮食,同时改善土壤健康状况、支持生物多样性、降低投入成本并增强气候适应能力。关于其在不同系统和气候条件下的环境及社会经济影响的证据仍然有限,很少有研究在整个农业系统转型后衡量多种成果。为了产生影响,再生农业研究必须满足农民的知识需求,并提供切实可行、经济上可行的解决方案。这可以通过与农民利益相关者在现实环境中共同设计的基于行动的研究来实现。此类研究耗时且对采用新实践组合的农民存在潜在风险。在此,我们描述了两个英国研究项目,它们与农民合作,在不同规模上收集关于再生农业的证据。一个是叠加再生原则的重复大型地块试验,另一个是农民主导的准实验,跟踪活跃农场业务的转型,并使用基于再生原则的灵活评分系统。我们强调了这些项目中出现的益处、挑战和未来研究方向,包括:定义再生农业的挑战;共同设计和最大化知识交流;当实践和成果取决于具体情况时,将研究结果推广到研究地点之外;跨学科的必要性;以及在短期资金环境下,在系统变化和成果之间存在时间滞后的情况下,生成关于长期转型的证据。本文是主题为“为人类和地球健康转变陆地食物系统”的一部分。