Dorigon-Santos Jardel, de Oliveira Costa Geovanna, Martins Heloisa Cardoso, Régis Julia Roberta, Badaró Maurício Malheiros, Wilhelmsen Niels Salles Willo, Ribeiro Juliana Silva, do Prado Maira, Sandjo Louis Pergaud, Duque Thais Mageste
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Av. Delfino Conti, S/N, Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Department of Dentistry, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Odontology. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01183-5.
This study aimed to analyze the chemical interactions between commonly used endodontic irrigants and evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of etidronic acid (HEDP), glycolic acid (GA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as final irrigants. The solutions tested included 9% HEDP, 17% GA, 17% EDTA, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel, and distilled water (DW). Solutions were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and analyzed using electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-QToF). The pH values were measured with a calibrated pHmeter. For the microbiological assay, ninety mandibular premolars were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis and incubated for 5 days. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 18), according to the final irrigation protocol: 17% EDTA, 17% GA, 9% HEDP in NaOCl, 9% HEDP in saline (SS), and SS alone. Microbial sampling was performed before and after chemomechanical preparation and final irrigation. Colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) were quantified, log-transformed, and statistically analyzed using Friedman and Dunn's post hoc tests. Chemical analysis revealed precipitate formation in the mixtures of NaOCl with CHX gel, NaOCl with EDTA, CHX gel with HEDP, and CHX with EDTA. No p-chloroaniline (PCA) or other toxic byproducts were detected. GA, HEDP and EDTA irrigants reduced bacterial load. These results highlight the potential of the solution as an effective final irrigant and underscore the importance of understanding chemical interactions among irrigants to prevent adverse effects during endodontic therapy.
本研究旨在分析常用根管冲洗剂之间的化学相互作用,并评估依替膦酸(HEDP)、乙醇酸(GA)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)作为最终冲洗剂的抗菌效果。测试的溶液包括9% HEDP、17% GA、17% EDTA、2.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、2%氯己定(CHX)凝胶和蒸馏水(DW)。将溶液按1:1比例混合,并使用电喷雾电离四极杆飞行时间质谱(ESI-QToF)进行分析。用校准后的pH计测量pH值。对于微生物学检测,将90颗下颌前磨牙接种粪肠球菌并孵育5天。根据最终冲洗方案,将牙齿随机分为五组(n = 18):17% EDTA、17% GA、NaOCl中的9% HEDP、盐水中的9% HEDP(SS)和单独的SS。在化学机械预备和最终冲洗前后进行微生物取样。对每毫升菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)进行定量、对数转换,并使用Friedman检验和Dunn事后检验进行统计分析。化学分析显示,NaOCl与CHX凝胶、NaOCl与EDTA、CHX凝胶与HEDP以及CHX与EDTA的混合物中形成了沉淀。未检测到对氯苯胺(PCA)或其他有毒副产物。GA、HEDP和EDTA冲洗剂降低了细菌载量。这些结果突出了该溶液作为有效最终冲洗剂的潜力,并强调了了解冲洗剂之间化学相互作用以防止根管治疗期间出现不良反应的重要性。