Goodman N C, Spiegelman S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Sep;68(9):2203-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.9.2203.
Assays are described that permit one to distinguish the reverse transcriptase of RNA tumor viruses from known normal cellular DNA-instructed DNA polymerases. Template responses of purified reverse transcriptase were compared with those of similar preparations of the DNA polymerase I of Escherichia coli and of calf-thymus polymerase. All three enzymes responded well to the synthetic duplexes poly(dT).poly(A), poly(U).poly(A), and poly(dT).poly(dA). Hence, these duplexes can detect, but cannot distinguish reverse, transcriptase from the known normal DNA polymerases. However, certain oligomer-homopolymer complexes serve as excellent distinguishing agents. The reverse transcriptase responds very well to (dT)(10).poly(A) and very poorly to (dT)(10).poly(dA), whereas both cellular DNA polymerases do not exhibit this behavior.Purified single-stranded RNA also serves as a diagnostic device, since only reverse transcriptase gives a detectable response. To be definitive, a positive response to RNA must be accompanied by a demonstration via molecular hybridization that the DNA product is complementary to the RNA and not to some minor DNA contaminant.
本文描述了一些检测方法,这些方法能够让人区分RNA肿瘤病毒的逆转录酶与已知的正常细胞DNA指导的DNA聚合酶。将纯化的逆转录酶的模板反应与大肠杆菌DNA聚合酶I和小牛胸腺聚合酶的类似制剂的模板反应进行了比较。这三种酶对合成双链体聚(dT)·聚(A)、聚(U)·聚(A)和聚(dT)·聚(dA)的反应都很好。因此,这些双链体可以检测到,但无法区分逆转录酶与已知的正常DNA聚合酶。然而,某些寡聚物-均聚物复合物可作为出色的区分剂。逆转录酶对(dT)10·聚(A)反应良好,对(dT)10·聚(dA)反应很差,而两种细胞DNA聚合酶均不表现出这种行为。纯化的单链RNA也可作为一种诊断工具,因为只有逆转录酶会产生可检测的反应。为了确定,对RNA的阳性反应必须伴有通过分子杂交证明DNA产物与RNA互补,而不是与某些微量DNA污染物互补。