Nakano J H
Bull World Health Organ. 1973 May;48(5):529-34.
Between July 1966 and May 1972 the Vesicular Disease Laboratory, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga., USA, tested specimens from 849 suspected smallpox cases by at least 2 methods, electron microscopy and chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) cultures. A smaller number of specimens was tested by each of 4 methods: electron microscopy, CAM culture, agar gel precipitation, and tissue culture. For specimens handled in the field the CAM culture method was less sensitive than electron microscopy because the adverse conditions often inactivated the virus. CAM cultures were valuable for identifying members of the poxvirus subgroups, however, particularly when supplemented by tissue culture. The agar gel precipitation test was the least sensitive but was of value in confirming the results of electron microscopy. The latter was highly effective for the diagnosis of varicella, but dependably identified only about half of the vaccinia infections; for vaccinia, the CAM technique was essential. The occurrence of human monkeypox cases in West Africa emphasized that the usual smallpox diagnostic methods were inadequate. More sophisticated tests, such as the rabbit dermal sensitivity test, are necessary for accurate diagnosis of these cases as monkeypox.
1966年7月至1972年5月期间,美国佐治亚州亚特兰大疾病控制中心的水疱病实验室,通过至少两种方法,即电子显微镜检查和鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜(CAM)培养,对849例疑似天花病例的标本进行了检测。还有少量标本通过以下4种方法中的每一种进行检测:电子显微镜检查、CAM培养、琼脂凝胶沉淀试验和组织培养。对于在现场处理的标本,CAM培养方法不如电子显微镜检查敏感,因为不利条件常常使病毒失活。然而,CAM培养对于鉴定痘病毒亚群成员很有价值,特别是在辅以组织培养时。琼脂凝胶沉淀试验最不敏感,但在确认电子显微镜检查结果方面有一定价值。电子显微镜检查对水痘的诊断非常有效,但仅能可靠地识别约一半的牛痘感染;对于牛痘,CAM技术必不可少。西非出现的人类猴痘病例强调了常规天花诊断方法的不足。对于准确诊断这些猴痘病例,需要更复杂的检测方法,如兔皮内敏感试验。