Klein G, Sugden B, Leibold W, Menezes J
Intervirology. 1974;3(4):232-44. doi: 10.1159/000149760.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) derived from the B95-8 line has transforming activity for cord blood cells, whereas virus derived from the P3HR-1 line lacks such activity. When the two viral preparations were compared for their ability to infect the same EBV-genome-negative lymphoblastoid cell line, BJA-B, they induced approximately the same number of EBV-determined nuclear antigen (EBNA)-positive cells. EBNA is compatibile with continued cell proliferation. No early antigen (EA)-positive cells appeared in the B95-8 virus-infected cultures, whereas P3HR-1 virus-infected cells went on to express EA. EA signals the entry of the cell into the lytic cycle. No late viral antigen (VCA) appeared and, as a consequence, the P3HR-1 virus infection became abortive. In contrast, the EBNA-positive cells induced by the B95-8 virus continued to divide over several weeks. These findings show that different EBV isolates may differ in their biological activity, probably due to their having different degrees of viral dependence on restrictive host cell controls.
源自B95 - 8细胞系的爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)对脐血细胞具有转化活性,而源自P3HR - 1细胞系的病毒则缺乏这种活性。当比较这两种病毒制剂感染同一EBV基因组阴性淋巴母细胞系BJA - B的能力时,它们诱导出的EBV决定核抗原(EBNA)阳性细胞数量大致相同。EBNA与细胞持续增殖相容。在B95 - 8病毒感染的培养物中未出现早期抗原(EA)阳性细胞,而P3HR - 1病毒感染的细胞继续表达EA。EA表明细胞进入裂解周期。未出现晚期病毒抗原(VCA),因此,P3HR - 1病毒感染失败。相比之下,B95 - 8病毒诱导的EBNA阳性细胞在数周内持续分裂。这些发现表明,不同的EBV分离株可能在生物学活性上存在差异,这可能是由于它们对限制性宿主细胞控制的病毒依赖性程度不同。