• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗会诊的同行评审:视听记录的使用。

Peer review of consultations in primary care: the use of audiovisual recordings.

作者信息

Verby J E, Holden P, Davis R H

出版信息

Br Med J. 1979 Jun 23;1(6179):1686-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6179.1686.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.1.6179.1686
PMID:466180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1599267/
Abstract

A rating scale was designed to measure performance in interviewing techniques in primary care. Peer review of audiovisual recordings of their consultations showed that a group of experienced general practitioners achieved significantly higher scores on the rating scale compared with a group of similarly experienced general practitioners who did not observe their recordings. The higher scores were obtained at the expense of longer consultations. The traditional five-minute appointment system in general practice needs to be reconsidered if an improved interviewing technique results in a more favourable outcome.

摘要

设计了一种评分量表来衡量初级保健中问诊技巧的表现。对他们会诊的视听记录进行同行评审发现,与一组未观看自己记录的经验相当的全科医生相比,一组经验丰富的全科医生在评分量表上的得分显著更高。较高的分数是以更长的会诊时间为代价获得的。如果改进的问诊技巧能带来更有利的结果,那么全科医疗中传统的五分钟预约制度就需要重新考虑。

相似文献

1
Peer review of consultations in primary care: the use of audiovisual recordings.基层医疗会诊的同行评审:视听记录的使用。
Br Med J. 1979 Jun 23;1(6179):1686-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6179.1686.
2
A study of the interviewing skills of trainee assistants in general pactice.
Patient Couns Health Educ. 1980;2(2):68-71. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(80)80004-8.
3
A comparison of videotape and audiotape assessment of patient-centredness in family physicians' consultations.家庭医生会诊中以患者为中心程度的录像带与录音带评估比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Nov;45(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00199-3.
4
Pilot study to develop and test a generic peer feedback instrument to review videotaped consultations in primary care.一项开发并测试通用同伴反馈工具以审查初级保健中录像会诊的试点研究。
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(6):347-54.
5
Assessment of general practice consultations: content validity of a rating scale.全科医疗会诊评估:一种评定量表的内容效度
Med Educ. 1990 Mar;24(2):110-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02508.x.
6
Consultation length: general practitioners' attitudes and practices.咨询时长:全科医生的态度与做法。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 May 4;290(6478):1322-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6478.1322.
7
Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures.全科医疗中的性心理问题:使用两种不同方法测量诊疗能力。
Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(4):243-50.
8
Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity.使用咨询满意度调查问卷来评估患者对全科医生和社区护士的满意度:信度、可重复性和区分效度。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jan;46(402):26-31.
9
The patient, the doctor and the emergency department: a cross-sectional study of patient-centredness in 1990 and 2005.患者、医生与急诊科:1990年和2005年以患者为中心的横断面研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):320-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 May 20.
10
Consultation in general practice: a standard operating procedure?全科医疗中的会诊:一种标准操作程序?
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Aug;54(2):227-33. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00239-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience With Care, But Gains Erode Later.影子教练提高了患者的护理体验,但后来收益逐渐减少。
Med Care. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):950-960. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001629.
2
Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations.改善医学生医患沟通技能的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 8;2(2):CD012418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012418.pub2.
3
Interventions to increase or decrease the length of primary care physicians' consultation.旨在增加或减少初级保健医生诊疗时长的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 25;2016(8):CD003540. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003540.pub3.
4
Interpersonal skills and the credibility of family medicine.人际关系技巧与家庭医学的可信度。
Can Fam Physician. 1983 Feb;29:347-50.
5
The effect of interventions to alter the consultation length of family physicians: a systematic review.改变家庭医生诊疗时长的干预措施效果:一项系统综述
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov;56(532):876-82.
6
Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence and experience.关于医患关系的思考:基于证据与经验
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Oct;55(519):793-801.
7
Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide.基层医疗中同行评审的质量改进:实用指南。
Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):147-52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.147.
8
Implementing guidelines in general practice care.在全科医疗中实施指南。
Qual Health Care. 1992 Sep;1(3):184-91. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.3.184.
9
General practitioners' continuing education: a review of policies, strategies and effectiveness, and their implications for the future.全科医生继续教育:政策、策略与成效综述及其对未来的启示
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Oct;48(435):1689-95.
10
Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?在全科医疗中实施指南与创新:哪些干预措施是有效的?
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Feb;48(427):991-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching medical interviewing: a practical technique.
Br J Med Educ. 1972 Jun;6(2):133-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1972.tb02187.x.
2
Clinical and administrative review in general practice.全科医疗中的临床与管理评估
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Dec;25(161):888-96.
3
Self-observation in general practice--the bleep method.全科医疗中的自我观察——传呼法
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Jun;25(155):425-31.
4
An experimental comparison of three courses in history-taking skills for medical students.
Med Educ. 1977 May;11(3):175-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1977.tb00588.x.
5
The value of feedback in teaching interviewing skills to medical students.反馈在向医学生传授问诊技巧教学中的价值。
Psychol Med. 1978 Nov;8(4):695-704. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700018894.
6
The length of consultations in general practice.全科医疗中的会诊时长。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Sep;27(182):552-5.
7
History-taking for medical students. II-Evaluation of a training programme.医学生病史采集。II - 一项培训计划的评估
Lancet. 1976 Sep 11;2(7985):558-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91805-5.
8
History-taking for medical students. I-Deficiencies in performance.
Lancet. 1976 Sep 11;2(7985):556-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91804-3.