Bartlett R C, Mazens M F
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Jun;15(6):769-74. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.6.769.
A rapid method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing has been developed, which uses a modified microdilution procedure and an inoculum of 10(7) bacteria per ml. Results are determined within 4 h with an indicator consisting of 2(p-iodophenyl)-3(p-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride. The precipitation of a red formazan by bacteria uninhibited by antimicrobials is accelerated by the addition of phenazine methosulfate. Isolates are classified as resistant, indeterminate, or susceptible, based on growth in up to two antimicrobial concentrations which conform closely to concentrations which correlate with the millimeter breakpoints used in the Bauer-Kirby method. Results of testing 10 antimicrobial agents against 1,126 isolates were compared with results obtained when the Bauer-Kirby method and the agar dilution procedure were used as reference methods. Enterococci were excluded because of false resistance. Discrepancies were classified as very major (false susceptibility), major (false resistance), and minor (combinations of susceptibility or resistance with indeterminate results). The rapid method versus the agar dilution method yielded 2.3% very major, 0.7% major, and 2.9% minor discrepancies, for a total of 6.0%. Of 58 organism-antimicrobial agent combinations tested, 23 displayed 1% very major discrepancies between the rapid method and the agar dilution method. Six were not therapeutically important. The remainder involved Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Acinetobacter sp., and most organisms tested with chloramphenicol. It is suggested that adjustments in antibiotic concentrations and/or inoculum size may eliminate these discrepancies. The rapid method appeared economical when compared with Autobac 1 and the Bauer-Kirby procedure.
已开发出一种快速抗菌药敏试验方法,该方法采用改良的微量稀释程序,接种物浓度为每毫升10(7)个细菌。使用由2-(对碘苯基)-3-(对硝基苯基)-5-苯基氯化四氮唑组成的指示剂,4小时内即可得出结果。对于未受抗菌药物抑制的细菌所产生的红色甲臜沉淀,通过添加硫酸吩嗪可加速其形成。根据在高达两种抗菌药物浓度下的生长情况,将分离株分为耐药、不确定或敏感,这两种浓度与鲍尔-柯比法中使用的毫米断点相关浓度密切相符。将针对1126株分离株测试10种抗菌药物的结果,与使用鲍尔-柯比法和琼脂稀释法作为参考方法时获得的结果进行了比较。由于假耐药性,肠球菌被排除在外。差异被分为极主要(假敏感)、主要(假耐药)和次要(敏感或耐药与不确定结果的组合)。快速方法与琼脂稀释法相比,极主要差异为2.3%,主要差异为0.7%,次要差异为2.9%,总计6.0%。在测试的58种微生物-抗菌药物组合中,23种在快速方法和琼脂稀释法之间显示出1%的极主要差异。其中6种在治疗上不重要。其余涉及金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、不动杆菌属以及大多数用氯霉素测试的微生物。建议调整抗生素浓度和/或接种物大小可能会消除这些差异。与自动细菌鉴定仪1和鲍尔-柯比程序相比,快速方法似乎更经济。