Guerra-Caceres J G, Gotuzzo-Herencia E, Crosby-Dagnino E, Miro-Quesada M, Carrillo-Parodi C
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1979;73(6):680-3. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(79)90020-8.
The diagnostic efficacy of bone-marrow culture, serial blood cultures and agglutination tests was compared in a prospective study of 60 patients with typhoid fever, two thirds of whom had received prior antibacterial therapy. Salmonella typhi was recovered from marrow cultures in 95% of patients but blood cultures were positive in only 43.3% (P less than 0.001). Agglutination tests were eventually diagnostic in 56.7% of patients, but in only 25% at the time of admission. If procedures had been limited to blood cultures and agglutination tests, diagnosis would have been missed in 21.7% of cases. The efficacy of marrow cultures was affected not by the duration of disease but by the extent of antibacterial therapy before presentation. Bacteriological recovery was faster from marrow cultures.
在一项对60例伤寒患者的前瞻性研究中,比较了骨髓培养、系列血培养和凝集试验的诊断效力,其中三分之二的患者此前接受过抗菌治疗。95%的患者骨髓培养分离出伤寒沙门菌,但血培养仅43.3%呈阳性(P<0.001)。凝集试验最终对56.7%的患者有诊断价值,但入院时仅为25%。若仅采用血培养和凝集试验,21.7%的病例会漏诊。骨髓培养的效力不受病程影响,而是受就诊前抗菌治疗的程度影响。骨髓培养细菌学恢复更快。