Suppr超能文献

十二指肠线囊培养与骨髓、血液及直肠拭子培养用于诊断伤寒和副伤寒热的比较

Duodenal string-capsule culture compared with bone-marrow, blood, and rectal-swab cultures for diagnosing typhoid and paratyphoid fever.

作者信息

Hoffman S L, Punjabi N H, Rockhill R C, Sutomo A, Rivai A R, Pulungsih S P

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 1984 Feb;149(2):157-61. doi: 10.1093/infdis/149.2.157.

Abstract

The sensitivity of duodenal string-capsule culture (DSCC) was compared to that of bone-marrow-aspirate culture (BMAC), single 3-ml blood culture (BC), and rectal-swab culture (RSC) for isolating Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi type A from patients with typhoid and paratyphoid fever. In 36 of 154 patients DSCC could not be used, usually because the patient was too ill to swallow the capsule. In the remaining 118 patients DSCC was positive in 57.6%, RSC in 35.6%, BC in 54.2%, and BMAC in 85.6%. The sensitivity of DSCC was improved by an additional 4.7% if subcultured daily for seven days. The DSCC has no advantage over the combination of RSC and BC and is inferior in sensitivity to the BMAC. However, when a BMAC cannot be obtained, the addition of the DSCC to BC and RSC can be expected to improve the isolation rate by greater than 17%, to at least 85%.

摘要

为了从伤寒热和副伤寒热患者中分离出伤寒沙门氏菌和甲型副伤寒沙门氏菌,对十二指肠线囊培养(DSCC)与骨髓抽吸培养(BMAC)、单次3毫升血培养(BC)以及直肠拭子培养(RSC)的敏感性进行了比较。在154例患者中,有36例无法使用DSCC,通常是因为患者病情太重无法吞咽胶囊。在其余118例患者中,DSCC的阳性率为57.6%,RSC为35.6%,BC为54.2%,BMAC为85.6%。如果连续7天每天进行传代培养,DSCC的敏感性可再提高4.7%。DSCC与RSC和BC联合使用相比没有优势,且在敏感性上低于BMAC。然而,当无法获得BMAC时,在BC和RSC中加入DSCC有望将分离率提高超过17%,至少达到85%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验