Suppr超能文献

用于链球菌分组的商用乳胶凝集试剂的评估

Evaluation of commercial latex agglutination reagents for grouping streptococci.

作者信息

Facklam R R, Cooksey R C, Wortham E C

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):641-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.641-646.1979.

Abstract

A total of 155 strains of beta-hemolytic streptococci were serologically grouped by conventional techniques (Lancefield extraction and capillary precipitin testing) and by latex agglutination (LA). Agreement between conventional and LA techniques was 97% when the instructions of the manufacturer for the LA technique were followed. Agreement of 99% was obtained when modified autoclave extracts were used as antigens in the LA procedure. A total of 82 strains of non-beta-hemolytic streptococci were also tested by conventional, prescribed LA, and modified autoclave procedures. The agreement between conventional techniques and both LA procedures was 76%. However, when serological cross-reactions in the conventional grouping procedures were considered as errors, the accuracy of identification of both LA procedures was 88% among the non-beta-hemolytic strains. Of 13 strains of Streptococcus bovis, 10 did not react with the LA group D reagent but were serogroup D by conventional techniques. More S. bovis strains were grouped by the LA technique when extracts of 20 ml of broth cultures were used as antigens; however, cross-reactions were observed with non-group D strains when this technique was applied to them.

摘要

采用传统技术(兰斯菲尔德提取法和毛细管沉淀素试验)以及乳胶凝集试验(LA)对总共155株β溶血性链球菌进行血清学分组。若遵循LA技术制造商的说明,传统技术与LA技术的一致性为97%。当在LA程序中使用改良的高压灭菌提取物作为抗原时,一致性达到99%。还采用传统方法、规定的LA方法以及改良的高压灭菌程序对总共82株非β溶血性链球菌进行了检测。传统技术与两种LA程序之间的一致性为76%。然而,若将传统分组程序中的血清学交叉反应视为错误,在非β溶血性菌株中,两种LA程序的鉴定准确率为88%。在13株牛链球菌中,有10株不与LA D组试剂发生反应,但通过传统技术鉴定为D血清群。当使用20毫升肉汤培养物的提取物作为抗原时,更多的牛链球菌菌株通过LA技术进行了分组;然而,当将该技术应用于非D组菌株时,观察到了交叉反应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Inhibition of nonspecific streptococcal coagglutination reactions.非特异性链球菌凝聚反应的抑制
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;17(2):192-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.2.192-194.1983.
9
Identification of group D streptococci by SeroSTAT.通过SeroSTAT鉴定D群链球菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):58-60. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.58-60.1982.

本文引用的文献

7
Comparison of three methods for grouping streptococci.三种链球菌分组方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):28-31. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.28-31.1976.
8
Physiological differentiation of viridans streptococci.草绿色链球菌的生理分化
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb;5(2):184-201. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.2.184-201.1977.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验