Suppr超能文献

将API 20S链球菌鉴定系统与免疫电泳法以及两种用于鉴定β-溶血性链球菌的商业乳胶凝集试验进行比较。

Comparison of the API 20S Streptococcus identification system with an immunorheophoresis procedure and two commercial latex agglutination tests for identifying beta-hemolytic streptococci.

作者信息

Keville M W, Doern G V

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):92-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.92-95.1982.

Abstract

The API 20S Streptococcus identification system and a new immunorheophoresis procedure were evaluated as means for determining the Lancefield serogroup of beta-hemolytic streptococci recovered from human clinical specimens. The serogroup of 96 strains was determined by these methods and by two commercially available latex agglutination tests. Streptex and SeroSTAT. The results of all four procedures were compared with the results of a classical precipitin test. The API 20S system correctly categorized 92.7% of the isolates; 94.8% were correctly identified by the immunorheophoresis procedure. The latex agglutination procedures were of comparable accuracy, yielding correct identifications with approximately 92% of the strains tested.

摘要

对API 20S链球菌鉴定系统和一种新的免疫流变学方法进行了评估,作为确定从人类临床标本中分离出的β溶血性链球菌的兰斯菲尔德血清群的手段。通过这些方法以及两种市售乳胶凝集试验(Streptex和SeroSTAT)确定了96株菌株的血清群。将所有四种方法的结果与经典沉淀试验的结果进行了比较。API 20S系统正确分类了92.7%的分离株;免疫流变学方法正确鉴定了94.8%的分离株。乳胶凝集方法的准确性相当,对约92%的测试菌株做出了正确鉴定。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验