Suppr超能文献

将API 20S链球菌鉴定系统与免疫电泳法以及两种用于鉴定β-溶血性链球菌的商业乳胶凝集试验进行比较。

Comparison of the API 20S Streptococcus identification system with an immunorheophoresis procedure and two commercial latex agglutination tests for identifying beta-hemolytic streptococci.

作者信息

Keville M W, Doern G V

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jul;16(1):92-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.1.92-95.1982.

Abstract

The API 20S Streptococcus identification system and a new immunorheophoresis procedure were evaluated as means for determining the Lancefield serogroup of beta-hemolytic streptococci recovered from human clinical specimens. The serogroup of 96 strains was determined by these methods and by two commercially available latex agglutination tests. Streptex and SeroSTAT. The results of all four procedures were compared with the results of a classical precipitin test. The API 20S system correctly categorized 92.7% of the isolates; 94.8% were correctly identified by the immunorheophoresis procedure. The latex agglutination procedures were of comparable accuracy, yielding correct identifications with approximately 92% of the strains tested.

摘要

对API 20S链球菌鉴定系统和一种新的免疫流变学方法进行了评估,作为确定从人类临床标本中分离出的β溶血性链球菌的兰斯菲尔德血清群的手段。通过这些方法以及两种市售乳胶凝集试验(Streptex和SeroSTAT)确定了96株菌株的血清群。将所有四种方法的结果与经典沉淀试验的结果进行了比较。API 20S系统正确分类了92.7%的分离株;免疫流变学方法正确鉴定了94.8%的分离株。乳胶凝集方法的准确性相当,对约92%的测试菌株做出了正确鉴定。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验