Parkes C M
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 Jan;28(186):19-30.
Among 276 married patients with cancer under the age of 65 who died in two South London boroughs during the period 1967 to 1971, 41 were still under active treatment at the time of death. I studied the remaining 85 per cent who experienced some form of terminal care, and in particular compared reports by the surviving spouses of 65 patients whose care was home-centred and 100 hospital-centred patients.Although home-centred care was most often chosen for patients who were said to have had little severe pain before the period of terminal care, during that period there was a sharp increase in reports of pain, much of it severe and unrelieved. Hospital-centred patients were said to have had much less pain and more confusion during the final phase of care and were more likely to have been confined to bed than those at home. The amount of anxiety reported by the patient's spouse was not markedly different under the two patterns of care, nor did the pattern of care influence subsequent adjustment to bereavement.Qualitative differences between the two groups are considered and it is concluded that although home-centred care can be successful it is often associated with unnecessary suffering. Implications for the home care of the terminally ill are discussed.
在1967年至1971年期间于伦敦南部两个行政区去世的276名65岁以下已婚癌症患者中,有41人在死亡时仍在接受积极治疗。我研究了其余接受了某种形式临终关怀的85%的患者,尤其比较了65名以家庭为中心接受护理的患者和100名以医院为中心接受护理的患者的在世配偶所提供的报告。尽管以家庭为中心的护理最常被选用于那些据说在临终关怀期之前很少有剧痛的患者,但在此期间,疼痛报告急剧增加,其中许多疼痛严重且未得到缓解。据说以医院为中心接受护理的患者在护理的最后阶段疼痛要少得多,困惑更多,而且比在家中的患者更有可能卧床不起。在两种护理模式下,患者配偶报告的焦虑程度没有明显差异,护理模式也没有影响随后对丧亲之痛的调适。文中考虑了两组之间的质性差异,并得出结论:尽管以家庭为中心的护理可能会成功,但它常常与不必要的痛苦相关。文中还讨论了对临终患者家庭护理的启示。