Suppr超能文献

[腺病毒的实验室操作。III. 血清学检测的敏感性和特异性(作者译)]

[Laboratory procedures in adenoviruses. III. Sensitivity and specificity of serological tests (author's transl)].

作者信息

Wigand R, Keller D

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1976 May;234(4):417-33.

PMID:59498
Abstract

84 paired sera from patients with adenoviral infections were tested in neutralization and hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) against the homologous as well as against heterologous virus types of the respective subgroup. Only titer rises are considered as positive reactions. Sera of patients being infected with adenoviruses of subgroup I viruses (52 pairs, types 7, 3, 4, 14) exhibit high rates of positive reactions in the group-specific complementfixation (CF) and in homologous neutralization, lower rates in homologous HI. On the other hand, heterologous reactions are seen more frequently in neutralization than in HI. Patients with type 4 infections often show antibody responses with viruses of subgroup III (types 1, 2, 5, 6). In infections with these virus types, homologous antibody response is seen in approximately half of the cases only; heterologous reactions are observed rarely. Patients with type 8-infections (25 pairs) almost invariably show positive homologous neutralization, while HI or CF tests often fail to show rising titers. These patients, as well as 2 patients with type 19-infection, exhibit a remarcable high rate and range of cross-reactions in neutralization as well as in HI with numerous types if subgroup II and, to a lesser extent, with viruses outside of subgroup II. Although the relatively late appearance of type-specific antibodies (usually between the 10 th and 14 th days after onset of disease) is advantageous for the demonstration of antibody rises, the type-specific diagnosis of adenoviral infections should preferably be performed by isolation and typing of the virus. The heterologous reactions appear to be based on the presence of overlapping intertypic antigenic determinants rather than on an anamnestic antibody response.

摘要

对84份来自腺病毒感染患者的配对血清进行了中和试验和血凝抑制(HI)试验,以检测其对各自亚组的同源以及异源病毒类型的反应。只有滴度升高才被视为阳性反应。感染I亚组腺病毒(52对,7、3、4、14型)的患者血清在组特异性补体结合(CF)试验和同源中和试验中显示出较高的阳性反应率,在同源HI试验中的阳性反应率较低。另一方面,中和试验中的异源反应比HI试验中更常见。4型感染患者常对III亚组病毒(1、2、5、6型)产生抗体反应。在这些病毒类型的感染中,仅约一半的病例出现同源抗体反应;很少观察到异源反应。8型感染患者(25对)几乎总是显示同源中和试验阳性,而HI或CF试验往往未能显示滴度升高。这些患者以及2例19型感染患者在中和试验以及HI试验中与II亚组的多种病毒类型,以及在较小程度上与II亚组以外的病毒,均表现出极高的交叉反应率和反应范围。尽管型特异性抗体相对较晚出现(通常在疾病发作后第10至14天之间)有利于证明抗体升高,但腺病毒感染的型特异性诊断最好通过病毒分离和分型来进行。异源反应似乎是基于重叠的型间抗原决定簇的存在,而不是基于回忆性抗体反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验